Share.

    12 Kommentare

    1. Hiraeth-nomad on

      > Non-hostile vessels, ​including those belonging to or associated with other States, may – provided ​that they neither participate in nor support acts of aggression against Iran and ‌fully ⁠comply with the declared safety and security regulations

      >Iran has „taken necessary and proportionate measures to prevent ​the aggressors and ​their supporters from ⁠exploiting the Strait of Hormuz to advance hostile operations against Iran,“ the note read, adding vessels, ​equipment, and any assets belonging to the U.S. or ​Israel, „as ⁠well as other participants in the aggression, do not qualify for innocent or non-hostile passage.“

    2. the Iranian government supports acts of aggression against innocent Iranian people and victims of the global terror Iran supports, guess that is as good a justification as theirs to take out their leadership.

    3. AssociateGreat2350 on

      >adding vessels, ​equipment, and any assets belonging to the U.S. or ​Israel, „as ⁠well as other participants in the aggression, do not qualify for innocent or non-hostile passage.“

    4. The_Oregon_Duck on

      So they didn’t mine the straits?

      Because if they did, I don’t think they can really just let ships through a floating minefield.

    5. Its going to be crazy funny if the U.S. or allies pulls a Russian / Venezuelan move through the straight with an illegal tanker. 

      At any rate, the Saudi’s, American’s, and whatever allies should be working quick to build and defend a new supply line to the Red Sea. 

    6. What fraction of ships in the strait are allowed vs blocked then? Are they doing this based on destination country?

    7. adrenahfrd543-L on

      And let me guess, they get to be the sole judge of what ‚hostile‘ means.

      >

    8. Non hostile? They’ve attacked almost every neighbor they have no mater whether they were involved or not. I’m not sure I’d trust anything they say

    Leave A Reply