> Non-hostile vessels, including those belonging to or associated with other States, may – provided that they neither participate in nor support acts of aggression against Iran and fully comply with the declared safety and security regulations
>Iran has „taken necessary and proportionate measures to prevent the aggressors and their supporters from exploiting the Strait of Hormuz to advance hostile operations against Iran,“ the note read, adding vessels, equipment, and any assets belonging to the U.S. or Israel, „as well as other participants in the aggression, do not qualify for innocent or non-hostile passage.“
Goosepond01 on
the Iranian government supports acts of aggression against innocent Iranian people and victims of the global terror Iran supports, guess that is as good a justification as theirs to take out their leadership.
Used-Examination1439 on
This seems like the biggest news of the war. What’s the catch ?
AssociateGreat2350 on
>adding vessels, equipment, and any assets belonging to the U.S. or Israel, „as well as other participants in the aggression, do not qualify for innocent or non-hostile passage.“
The_Oregon_Duck on
So they didn’t mine the straits?
Because if they did, I don’t think they can really just let ships through a floating minefield.
hotpopc0rn on
How much is the transit tax?
LostRonin on
Its going to be crazy funny if the U.S. or allies pulls a Russian / Venezuelan move through the straight with an illegal tanker.
At any rate, the Saudi’s, American’s, and whatever allies should be working quick to build and defend a new supply line to the Red Sea.
Ancient_Mud_2841 on
Is this the “gift” Trump was talking about?
Yansleydale on
What fraction of ships in the strait are allowed vs blocked then? Are they doing this based on destination country?
adrenahfrd543-L on
And let me guess, they get to be the sole judge of what ‚hostile‘ means.
>
44Stryker44 on
Non hostile? They’ve attacked almost every neighbor they have no mater whether they were involved or not. I’m not sure I’d trust anything they say
Majestic_Location751 on
Insurance companies aren’t taking Iran’s word for it
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
12 Kommentare
> Non-hostile vessels, including those belonging to or associated with other States, may – provided that they neither participate in nor support acts of aggression against Iran and fully comply with the declared safety and security regulations
>Iran has „taken necessary and proportionate measures to prevent the aggressors and their supporters from exploiting the Strait of Hormuz to advance hostile operations against Iran,“ the note read, adding vessels, equipment, and any assets belonging to the U.S. or Israel, „as well as other participants in the aggression, do not qualify for innocent or non-hostile passage.“
the Iranian government supports acts of aggression against innocent Iranian people and victims of the global terror Iran supports, guess that is as good a justification as theirs to take out their leadership.
This seems like the biggest news of the war. What’s the catch ?
>adding vessels, equipment, and any assets belonging to the U.S. or Israel, „as well as other participants in the aggression, do not qualify for innocent or non-hostile passage.“
So they didn’t mine the straits?
Because if they did, I don’t think they can really just let ships through a floating minefield.
How much is the transit tax?
Its going to be crazy funny if the U.S. or allies pulls a Russian / Venezuelan move through the straight with an illegal tanker.
At any rate, the Saudi’s, American’s, and whatever allies should be working quick to build and defend a new supply line to the Red Sea.
Is this the “gift” Trump was talking about?
What fraction of ships in the strait are allowed vs blocked then? Are they doing this based on destination country?
And let me guess, they get to be the sole judge of what ‚hostile‘ means.
>
Non hostile? They’ve attacked almost every neighbor they have no mater whether they were involved or not. I’m not sure I’d trust anything they say
Insurance companies aren’t taking Iran’s word for it