Ich habe von der NO-Planes-Theorie und der Theorie der vertauschten Flugzeuge gehört. Vertauschte Flugzeuge klingen wahrscheinlicher und KEINE Flugzeuge klingen nach mehr Arbeit. Allerdings habe ich mir stundenlang die Aufnahmen des Flugzeugs angeschaut. Was ich sehe, überzeugt mich nicht. Zu viele Ungereimtheiten und Dinge, die keinen logischen Sinn ergeben.
Was glauben Sie und haben Sie Videos oder Bilder, die Sie verlinken können, um Ihre Überzeugungen zu teilen? Ich werde nie aufhören, nach der Wahrheit zu suchen, ich sehne mich nach Antworten darauf. Ich streite oder diskutiere nichts außer den Flugzeugen, die hier in die Gebäude fliegen.
Von White_Falcon_1263
32 Kommentare
Planned demo
I stopped digging when I realized it was never my or anyone else’s job to prove the government lied, it was always the government’s job to prove they told the truth. If the official narrative is challenged by asking for actual evidence and not just „government told us“ their narrative falls apart in seconds.
I don’t know a single person to this day that 100% believes what the government says about 9/11
The simple and undeniable fact is that the planes did not have enough BTUs worth of fuel to heat up the steel to the level they claimed. It’s literally impossible. That’s not even accounting for the 1.7 billion pounds of concrete.
CGi has always been here
do not listen to them when they talk they technology we are never go see untill 2030 comes
7/11 was a part-time job
What i want to watch are the videos of Pentagon, there were plenty of cameras, inside and outside, you can see it even on the rooftop it was never released to the public besides a short clip.
They needed unanimous support for heading to the middle east. ( all aspects of controlled demo and inside job, knew it was coming and associated with the perps)
Same with the weapons of mass destruction
Same with Gaza
Simon Shack has the videos called September Clues. They have been deleted repeatedly off Youtube. They leave up all the noise, though.
Looks like a firetruck is sturdier than a twin tower
The planes were for sure on an autopilot, dialed into the exact center of the building. It is unlikely an experienced pilot could have enen don that once at the preported ground speed of 550 knotts, please.
There was clearly a plane. 1000s of people saw the planes and tgere are several angles of if hitting the building.
2020 election was rigged and no one talks about it anymore.
Planes were real but I think there were explosives installed to make sure they fell. Seems to me like the oligarchs new it would happen or influenced it.
I find the planes evidence to be weak and insignificat compared to the obvious explosion and pulverization of those 3 buildings
so I usually prefer to stress
– how does a building that is damaged on floor 90ish out of 110 collapses top to bottom into powder?
– how do people get pulverized (1800ish people scattered into 20.000 pieces, some small enough to fit into a lab tube)
– how do you explain experts witness reports (firefighters) reporting by the dozens EXPLOSIONS
– specifically, how do you explain the explosion in the north tower lobby recorded minutes before the collapse of the entire tower
– how did WTC7 turned into powder without being hit by a plane
– how do you explain the visible squibs
– how do you explain pools of molten steel and 100 days of fires on ground zero after the demolitions
those points in my opinion are so strong that is worth hammering those instead of the more fuzzy and kinda irrelevant swapped planes/no planes theories
The top reason why I think there are lies surrounding 9/11 is the way they handled the situation afterwards. They PUSHED this tragedy onto everyone. They were showing fucking videos of people jumping out of the buildings and dying to ELEMENTARY KIDS for fuck sakes. They talked about it on almost every channel. This is the same time that military recruitment ad’s were shown more often. They wanted these kids, young adults to be scared of „terrorism“ and the middle east so that they would grow up and be soldiers. The internet was in a lot of peoples homes by this time uncensored and teens and adults had access to gore videos and were exposed to „Isis“ cutting heads off..
This was all propaganda to get more people to join the military and to agree to mass surveillance..
911 was a baby bluebeam
Rumor has it that the CIA has technology 20+ years advanced from the rest of the world. We now have our fingertips on AI. It’s not far fetched to wonder if the CIA had AI in 2001. We wouldn’t have questioned an AI generated video in 2001.
Both towers were hit by planes and no bombs
Jet fuel doesnt melt steel beams. Fire does indeed soften steel beams. This is what blacksmithing is
Flight 93 was shot down.
U.s goverment had nothing to do with it
That’s theory 1.
Honestly I have no idea and whether it was them, or the u.s, or just Osama, or osama but under someone else i have no idea and we will never know.
planes could be real, even if they used explosives 😉
I believe this was an outsourced job.
I believe the CIA ensured the hijackers had the time and cover they needed without them even realizing they were being assisted by the CIA. The CIA obstructed the FBI. How much this was coordinated with Saudi and Israeli leadership and intelligence is something I can’t assume. I believe the hijackers themselves were somewhat ignorant to the CIA’s involvement.
The CIA and Israel did not want the public to find out that Saudi Arabia funded the hijackers because the 7 countries we wanted to accomplish regime change were Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Iran. Read about how we redacted every mention of Saudi Arabia in the commission report.
Circles of powerful people knew the attack was going to happen and when.
I do not make assumptions on how exactly they prepared the buildings (Tower 1,2,7) to have controlled demolition. But the timing of Larry Silverstein’s purchase and insurance policy makes it obvious he had prior knowledge.
Stock sales and „put options“ back up this idea of prior knowledge by wealthy individuals.
I believe flight 93 was shot down by US Air force. Enough had already been accomplished. The plane was then a liability. It is the only plane that was in the air after the order was given to scramble jets. The fables around passengers was a feel good story the citizens needed. They even made a movie. Just imagine if citizens knew we had to shoot down a plane? How loud would those citizens continue to beat the drums of war?
I dont believe the official story but i know Israel was involved somehow someway and saudi arabia too.
Controlled demolition , the planes were to cover up the insurance fraud . Homie didn’t want to pay the asbestos abatement costs so he specifically took out an insurance policy that covered acts of terrorism than blew up the buildings .
The „no planes“ theory is absolutely absurd. My father and a few of my coworkers, along with *thousands* of other people literally *saw* a plane that day.
The „no planes“ theory is absolutely absurd to anyone who grew up in the NYC Metro Area and lived around here that day.
has anyone hear watches the looming tower?
I saw it happen live, my father was blocks away, 2 planes definitely hit the towers. This isn’t some AI bs, not to say it was all exactly how they said but the planes DID hit the towers
Building 7 🤫
Do I think it was done with a hologram or some sort of AI? No absolutely not. BUT do I think that it’s an inside job and that it was done with a controlled demolition? Yes
I’m at the level that, I don’t think everything that David Ike says is true, but if it was, I wouldn’t be surprised.
Titanic was an inside job.
Again? How many times is this gonna be reposted?
Drones/cruise missiles and controlled demo (WTC 1 and 2). Controlled demo (WTC 7).