Ich habe gerade bemerkt, dass das berüchtigte „Kleinkind“-Foto – zu sehen über dem *Esstisch* von Little Saint James – vorne und in der Mitte über dem Kaminsims des New Yorker Stadthauses ausgestellt war – später vom Oval Office neu dekoriert und kopiert. Wenn Sie die Geschichte mit Trockenfleisch und Kannibalen nicht glauben – das dritte Bild: Das Gemälde eines Kleinkindes über einem kochenden Topf (mit Kleinkind darin) war die einzige Kunst, die im *Esszimmer* in New York ausgestellt wurde. Diese Leute sind Dämonen.

    Von hungjockca

    Share.

    6 Kommentare

    1. Truthsurge_24 on

      I have no doubt thst these people would do bad things.. but there is always 2 sides to the story.

      my grandparents would have a little cover over their toilet roll with what looked like a child holding it.. does it mean they were flushing children down the toilet?.

      they also had a lot of cherubs.. does that mean they like naked children?

      the architecture inside thst building is very vintage, and when you actually look back at fashionable icons at the time when this vintage style was popular, you would find a lot of depictions of of children, many partially naked, but not portrayed in a sexual manner, not dissimilar from what we see here.

      Sadly, you have quite literally taken otherwise innocent pictures of children and changed the narrative to fit your own world view whwn nothing sinister is shown.

      the last picture is proof of cannibalism?.. c’mon, talk about grasping at straws.

      I am all on board that these people were monsters, but there is just no need to twist things like this when there is already so much damning evidence already

    2. The painting of the toddler over the boiling pot – with figure inside – also on display in Paris apartment.

    3. Captain_Periwinkle on

      Yeah… of all the art in the world… Epstein was so rich, he could afford the most beautiful artwork imaginable. Instead he chooses to display a picture of a naked toddler sitting in a pot of water holding a phallic object.

    4. This is art. It’s not photographic evidence. What Epstein et al did is bad enough, but conflating it with actual events and truth is a quick path for people looking to defend the claims as absurd.

      It’s the same as the whole ‚demons‘ angle, these were bad PEOPLE, with agency and choice, don’t dress them up as something they aren’t, it steals away accountability…

    Leave A Reply