Share.

    23 Kommentare

    1. EuphoricEgg63063 on

      I was thinking this was going to happen. Esp after Rogan was talking about her.

    2. Big mistake. Legal action leads to discovery and I have a feeling this is one woman that doesn’t want to have to go through discovery.

    3. InterestSea4061 on

      Get it to court please. Seems to be a strange amount of meat on the bone

    4. AspiringOligarch on

      From the article:

      – – – – – – – – – –

      „Through her attorney, Paul Edgard Harold of SouthBank Legal, Kirk’s legal notice addresses Campbell’s allegations linking her to the death of her husband, Charlie Kirk, and insinuating connections to the late Jeffrey Epstein.

      […]

      “**Mrs. Kirk and TPUSA welcome vigorous and open debate and honest questions,**” the letter states, emphasizing that “**there is no place for publicly repeating patently false statements that injure another person’s reputation.**”

      – – – – – – – – –

      *Say anything you like* – ***as long as we like it.***

      Eri**K**a **K**ir**K**

    5. I believe Candace Owens might be interested in funding these people’s legal defence.

    6. Electronic_Yak9821 on

      This woman should not do anything that causes people to look into her shady past.

    7. Adventurous-Dot-34 on

      They probably want the truth to come out to fuck with us peasants minds.

    8. TinyHatsSuck on

      It’s for Scott Campbell, my immediate thought was it would be against Candace or Barron.

    9. TwinseyLohan on

      **The legal notice characterizes these assertions as “false and defamatory,” asserting they have inflicted “tremendous damage” on both Erika and her late husband’s nonprofit organization.**

      Girl these conspiracies entered my brain the moment it happened before I saw others thinking the same thing. I’ve never even heard of this Collin Scott, I’m sure 1 man is not the cause of the „tremendous damage“ that was done. Erika did that all on her own.

    Leave A Reply