Share.

    10 Kommentare

    1. HotelPuzzleheaded654 on

      *Shabana Mahmood will deport thousands of foreign criminals and failed asylum seekers before they can use human rights laws to appeal and block their removals.*

      *The Home Secretary is to use laws drawn up by Sir Tony Blair’s Labour government to remove them as soon as their asylum claims are rejected so that they can only appeal once they are back in their home countries.*

      Sounds pretty reasonable.

    2. No-Risk-2584 on

      I’m actually really impressed with Mahmood

      This a good move, there’s no reason we should be paying for them to stay here while they appeal.

    3. If asylum and irregular migration processing had kept up with demand there would be no need for this. It would be accepted practice.

    4. To find out the results of your asylum claim you should have to attend a room at Heathrow airport. If you’re approved you stay. If you aren’t you are put on a plane. 

    5. I’m pretty left wing, but I think this is just common sense. No idea why it isn’t already standard practice.

    6. quantum_splicer on

      Why not make it so that any human rights claim must be lodged before exhaustion of asylum claim and the appellate process.

    7. If your asylum case has failed, you have no right to be here. If you have committed a serious crime, you have forfeited your right to be here.

    8. VPackardPersuadedMe on

      They should only be allowed to appeal at their cost form outside the country. If at all.

    9. apple_kicks on

      Getting rid of appeals is mistake. There’s definitely going to be innocent people caught out by this with amount of times home office has tried to deport lgbt people who are in queer relationships and in danger for bullshit reasons in first case. We should fund courts and legal system better so they can be reviewed and heard within appropriate time

    Leave A Reply