
Das mit Atomantrieb betriebene U-Boot der Royal Navy erreicht das Arabische Meer – mit der Fähigkeit, Angriffe auf den Iran zu starten, wenn der Konflikt eskaliert
https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-nuclear-powered-submarine-positioned-arabian-sea-amid-regional-tensions-daily-2026-03-21/
Von esporx
22 Kommentare
It’s starting to feel like we might be involved in this. 🙄
We have several airbases in this region. Why have we sent a submarine?
The usual clickbait „nuclear powered“ aside – how many Tomahawks does one of these carry, and how much difference will that really make?
The US firepower is immense, and has seemingly wiped out most of Iran’s main assets already. But there’s loads of hidden places along the (very long) coastline which can launch a combined thousands of drones to take out shipping in the Straits.
Seems nothing is really going to take out all of Iran’s capability unless someone nukes their entire coastline over and over, which would obviously be insane and hopefully never happens.
Only took the lapdog a week or two to stop yapping and get back to heel
I dream of a day when the world properly distinguishes between SSN and SSBN in discourse and reporting.
That submarine should be in the North Atlantic helping us meet our nato commitments not in an illegal war in the Middle East trump has made it clear he doesn’t need us
tbf the Royal Navy could just park up by Cyprus and lob Cruise Missiles toward Iran. Most places there are still with in range. No real need to get too close.
Starmer really does want to get in on this, despite literally every sane person in the UK begging him not to. But he has to have his external war to silence internal party divisions.
Well, he’s threatening Greenland again now so maybe we have to show willing?
Wouldn’t surprise me if Starmer was just lying to Trump about this. Not like anyone can see it.
Can we not call this what it is? Trump, for his own vanity, has basically started a war that is repidly engulfing the world. Then he calls us cowards because we don’t want or need this illegal war. Trump needs to be removed from office, but getting JD Vance instead fills me with abject horror.
I have friends in Tehran, the Bekkaa valley, UAE. I do not support the UK getting involved. An end to this insanity will not come through force alone.
This is embarrassing. The phase of the war where a *handful* of TLAM launched from an RN SSN is long gone. Any targets where we could actually make an impact on the war with such a strike will have long been struck by the US and Israel. Maybe they might find something for us to strike just for the politics of it, but that’s just demeaning.
If we’re going to get involved, we’ll have to commit significantly more assets. Which we don’t have. So we should just stay out of it and suck up the high oil prices. Then domestically do the sums to see if the economic hurt was worth the decades of military penny pinching. Will we learn from this and change our ways? Doubt it.
How many times must Iran attack us before we start to say mean things about them? I’m assuming mean things are the worst we can do, considering how harshly they are policed in the UK
[removed]
To those complaining about economic warfare by the effect on supply lines and oil / gas prices:
Iran has been under immense economic warfare for over 47 years, crippling its economy, and nobody has ever lobbied meaningfully to reverse this.
Despite this, Iran has allowed for FREE transit through its territorial waters in the strait of Hormuz. In the Panama Canal, Suez Canal, Bosphorus Strait there are immense charges for passage. This is good-will on the part of Iran and just because you don’t like the country doesn’t mean it’s ok to exploit the kindness. They’re within their right to charge for its use which is likely their plan going forward.
Complaining about the closure and not complaining that an illegal war has been launched and started with the killing of 165+ school children is morally bankrupt.
Iran has negotiated with the US twice in the past nine months, and TWICE has been attacked in the middle of negotiations. This time energy infrastructure and mass attacks aiming to destroy the nation, this is existential for Iran.
Those of us in this part of the world are fed information to make us believe that 90 million people are hostage to a regime. The reality couldn’t be further from the truth, if that were true a revolution would have happened by now, instead millions are out in the streets every single night in support of their government – whether they like the system or not.
Finally – if you are pro UK involvement, and see it as a means to lowering prices, then I would say that’s a massive miscalculation and would expose UK assets in the region more than they already are.
FYI – I don’t buy any of the propaganda that Iran would strike European countries – what strategic benefit even is there for something like that?
Aren’t all submarines nuclear powered since like the Second World War? As diesel powered ones can only remain submerged for relatively short times.
It would be so much easier if everyone just declared war on Israel. This thing would be over bother morning.
I’m all for staying out but Iran is now running an extortion racket. Trump has made all the wrong moves but the grown ups now have to step in before we are living a real life Mad Max.
Nuclear powered sub. Better than a paddle steamer I suppose!
Ffs we better not be setting up to get involved in this shit
Kier don’t fucking shit the bed
Nuclear powered but is it nuclear carrying?
I feel the headline makes more threat than the actual submarine being in the region.
1951-1953 what horrible time in history.
All because of Mossadegh nationalising the Anglo Iranian Oil Company.
All the UK had to do was have some rational dialogue and agree to a partnerships…but no…it was just greed.
Did not think of the negative effect on generations to come.