With all due to respect to professor, I feel like he talks more emotionally than rationally on number of occasions.
Deckard_666 on
„Canadian-Chinese“ lecturing in Beijing. Exactly my kind of humor.
McRib_ on
7/10. Strong chin, nice hair, well manicured. I totally would
Attack_Toster on
I like the Chinese/Canadian version of Peter Zeihan better than the original
JustNeedAnswers78 on
I feel like some context is missing from this post.
foreverloveall on
I think the algorithm is set to „demoralize“.
CookedChooken on
Hmmm. Possible demon reptoid ancestry but hard to corroborate without dna sample
Kaliente13 on
He’s interesting and smart. I like him
tall_people_problemz on
Chinese plant
NoirRenie on
I really enjoy his talks on the war and history of countries and learning about game theory. But after seeing he made a video with Sneako, I am wary of the kind of person he is.
xXDelta33Xx on
He‘s quite entertaining to listen to at least.
Prince_Marf on
Grifter with lazy slop content. He’s not a real professor he teaches a high school class in China. He has a bunch of weird theories about Nephilim and other gnostic esoteric Christian shit with no substantiation. His youtube channel is basically just him sharing basic high-school level facts and analysis in an interesting way that makes him seem smart. But he also draws a lot of hasty conclusions and assumptions if you’re paying attention.
I think Vaush did a decent analysis of his content if you have a spare hour and a half: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN9bUUPPRZ8](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN9bUUPPRZ8)
Aromatic_Ad_1653 on
So far his words have been proven right. Watching his lectures is not a waste of time for me
Rough_Ad8048 on
I’m getting Asian vibes
FBossy on
Chinese fed
bipedalsheepxy777 on
I want know his backing, I think it might be CCP
ZANEZAND on
Right or wrong, he promotes critical thinking(which benefits no country, unless he only posts his stuff outside of china, still, chinese people of a lot of ways to get to his vid) and to question the stuff we’ve been fed and just taken for granted — which is more than most actual uni professors do (and he’s called them out on that, too).
„only speaking about conspiracies“ is pretty disrespectful to the courses he’s done on youtube alone. He bases a lot of what he says on history and even psychohistory, which sounds obvious but honestly, hardly anyone (even here) does it.
So yeah, for me he’s pretty legit. You don’t have to agree with everything he says, but you’ll definitely learn a lot and see things from angles you probably hadn’t considered before.
francie-brady on
For me, everything in YouTube is just entertainment. As long as I’m entertained, that’s okay. I like his lectures and his points of view on the Current events. What else would you want? the truth?! Well, too bad for you, ‚cause it’s too much to ask.
prinkboss on
Even if he’s a Chinese plant, exposing the truth is far more powerful than any false narrative their government can cook up. His arguments seem reasonable and in good faith
Mr-Wigz on
I think he’s interesting and intelligent. I’ll watch him sometimes, not too often.
I remember not even knowing he existed, to the algorithm absolutely pushing everywhere in a rather short period of time.
I don’t really know what to make of that at this point.
Ria_Isa on
I like his talks. I’m happy to attend his classes
OddGold348 on
Gotta look at his Ratemyprofessor first
MalwareExe0001 on
He is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. He does not believe in Jesus Christ as Lord. He teaches and believes God lied in the garden in eden when instructing adam and eve about the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. There are other things in the bible he tries to twist as well which you can find out just by listening to his “classes”
Every “prediction” he’s so called made isn’t a prediction he’s just getting information by his handlers while also copying what the bible says about the end times, yet he doesn’t believe in the full bible he just picks and chooses certain verses to make his “predictions” and analogies seem accurate and truthful when it isn’t.
He is most likely just another mason or in a satanic secret society like it playing his part working for satan. The world is a stage and everyone who serves satan has a deceptive role to play, he’s certainly playing his.
FancierKiwi on
Hot af
liberterrorism on
An entertaining crank who is dead on about a lot of stuff, but has a tendency to go off the deep end.
Nightlower on
Fun. With some of his theories he fits right into conspiracy territory and he mentioned couple of times to not take him for his word because yeah in the end he’s just guessing and providing his opinion
BleakView on
He has quite the ability to use game theory to predict future scenarios and he has correctly made multiple predictions using this method.
He can come off a bit condescending to his students sometimes, but i think this is due to him preferring to speak about systems in a broader scale while his students tend to want answers about specific topics or scenarios instead of trying to look at the systems as a whole and the bigger picture that hes trying to teach them about.
He seems relatively unbiased despite his Chinese background and I’ve heard him speak negatively about both U.S. and China multiple times so I don’t really see him being a double agent or whatever and more as a really smart individual who has become jaded thru his own knowledge and understanding of power systems.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
27 Kommentare
With all due to respect to professor, I feel like he talks more emotionally than rationally on number of occasions.
„Canadian-Chinese“ lecturing in Beijing. Exactly my kind of humor.
7/10. Strong chin, nice hair, well manicured. I totally would
I like the Chinese/Canadian version of Peter Zeihan better than the original
I feel like some context is missing from this post.
I think the algorithm is set to „demoralize“.
Hmmm. Possible demon reptoid ancestry but hard to corroborate without dna sample
He’s interesting and smart. I like him
Chinese plant
I really enjoy his talks on the war and history of countries and learning about game theory. But after seeing he made a video with Sneako, I am wary of the kind of person he is.
He‘s quite entertaining to listen to at least.
Grifter with lazy slop content. He’s not a real professor he teaches a high school class in China. He has a bunch of weird theories about Nephilim and other gnostic esoteric Christian shit with no substantiation. His youtube channel is basically just him sharing basic high-school level facts and analysis in an interesting way that makes him seem smart. But he also draws a lot of hasty conclusions and assumptions if you’re paying attention.
I think Vaush did a decent analysis of his content if you have a spare hour and a half: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN9bUUPPRZ8](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN9bUUPPRZ8)
So far his words have been proven right. Watching his lectures is not a waste of time for me
I’m getting Asian vibes
Chinese fed
I want know his backing, I think it might be CCP
Right or wrong, he promotes critical thinking(which benefits no country, unless he only posts his stuff outside of china, still, chinese people of a lot of ways to get to his vid) and to question the stuff we’ve been fed and just taken for granted — which is more than most actual uni professors do (and he’s called them out on that, too).
„only speaking about conspiracies“ is pretty disrespectful to the courses he’s done on youtube alone. He bases a lot of what he says on history and even psychohistory, which sounds obvious but honestly, hardly anyone (even here) does it.
So yeah, for me he’s pretty legit. You don’t have to agree with everything he says, but you’ll definitely learn a lot and see things from angles you probably hadn’t considered before.
For me, everything in YouTube is just entertainment. As long as I’m entertained, that’s okay. I like his lectures and his points of view on the Current events. What else would you want? the truth?! Well, too bad for you, ‚cause it’s too much to ask.
Even if he’s a Chinese plant, exposing the truth is far more powerful than any false narrative their government can cook up. His arguments seem reasonable and in good faith
I think he’s interesting and intelligent. I’ll watch him sometimes, not too often.
I remember not even knowing he existed, to the algorithm absolutely pushing everywhere in a rather short period of time.
I don’t really know what to make of that at this point.
I like his talks. I’m happy to attend his classes
Gotta look at his Ratemyprofessor first
He is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. He does not believe in Jesus Christ as Lord. He teaches and believes God lied in the garden in eden when instructing adam and eve about the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. There are other things in the bible he tries to twist as well which you can find out just by listening to his “classes”
Every “prediction” he’s so called made isn’t a prediction he’s just getting information by his handlers while also copying what the bible says about the end times, yet he doesn’t believe in the full bible he just picks and chooses certain verses to make his “predictions” and analogies seem accurate and truthful when it isn’t.
He is most likely just another mason or in a satanic secret society like it playing his part working for satan. The world is a stage and everyone who serves satan has a deceptive role to play, he’s certainly playing his.
Hot af
An entertaining crank who is dead on about a lot of stuff, but has a tendency to go off the deep end.
Fun. With some of his theories he fits right into conspiracy territory and he mentioned couple of times to not take him for his word because yeah in the end he’s just guessing and providing his opinion
He has quite the ability to use game theory to predict future scenarios and he has correctly made multiple predictions using this method.
He can come off a bit condescending to his students sometimes, but i think this is due to him preferring to speak about systems in a broader scale while his students tend to want answers about specific topics or scenarios instead of trying to look at the systems as a whole and the bigger picture that hes trying to teach them about.
He seems relatively unbiased despite his Chinese background and I’ve heard him speak negatively about both U.S. and China multiple times so I don’t really see him being a double agent or whatever and more as a really smart individual who has become jaded thru his own knowledge and understanding of power systems.