Close Menu
    Vereinigtes Königreich

    Migrant, der walisischen Teenager vergewaltigte, wurde nicht abgeschoben, um sein „Recht auf Familienleben“ zu respektieren


    Migrant, der walisischen Teenager vergewaltigte, wurde nicht abgeschoben, um sein „Recht auf Familienleben“ zu respektieren

    https://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/migrant-who-raped-welsh-teenager-33613810

    Von Anony_mouse202

    View 15 Comments

    15 Kommentare

    1. yubnubster on

      We need zero tolerance for foreign born criminals commiting serious, or less serious, but regular, criminal offences. Once they’ve served whatever excuse of a sentence they’ve been given, they need to be removed from the UK. No right to appeal that decision.

      He can have his family life via what’s app, and if they still actually want to be around him, they can make arrangements to follow him in their own time.

      The law as it stands clearly isn’t working.

    2. Jaded_Strain_3753 on

      I don’t think this case is a clear as the headline makes it sound because he’s being living in the UK since he was 11. If I was in charge I’d just deport him anyway because he’s clearly evil so fuck him. That said, I don’t think this is an obviously awful ruling for the judge to have made

    3. New_7688 on

      The headline doesn’t fully show just how awful this decision was.

      In 2022 he kidnapped a young woman with the intention of raping her, she managed to escape his imprisonment before he was able to do so. That’s when the home office attempted to deport him. Instead, he managed to appeal and stay.

      Then he goes on to ruin the life of a teenage girl and rape her.

      He was only able to do so thanks to the „right to a family life“ bullshit decision.

      I seriously have to ask, what about our rights as women in this country? These monsters are being prioritised over us when they’re clearly a threat.

    4. chronicnerv on

      Where do we send them?
      We will not accept that Begum girl back. How can we get other countries to take back their criminals?
      Often, I think the reasons given are made up because we have no real power to deport them and seeming powerless is worse than incompetence.

    5. GhostRiders on

      Sorry but I am stupid?

      Surely this could easily be a massive win for ANY Government to simply say if you have come from another country and found guilty of committing a serious crime you will returned to the country of your origin end off.

      It doesn’t matter if you have a family here, it doesn’t matter if you are here legally, it doesn’t matter if your life will be at risk, you forfeit your right to any appeal.

    7. fdesouche on

      Right to family life > right to not get kidnapped, assaulted or raped. I feel awful for the women there

    8. Saliiim on

      The activists in the judiciary are constantly shooting themselves in the foot.  This is radicalising people more effectively than any Reform or Restore posts. 

    10. narayan77 on

      The government must be deliberately inflicting British society with such criminals. I don’t know what is their motive.

    11. Jensen1994 on

      The judges only interpret the laws they are given from politicians. That’s the problem. We either get radical with proper border control, pull out of the UN Refugee convention or pull out of the ECHR or use some clever lawyers to change the law.

    13. Univeralise on

      Can we get a law to pass that the safety of British nationals trumps migrants right to family life if they’re perceived as dangerous ?

      That’s all it takes. Parliament is sovereign.

    14. JigMaJox on

      why are they always so protected ?

      its like we will look for ANY possible reason to let them go.

    15. evolveandprosper on

      I am not defending this man in any way. I hope he gets a long sentence. However it is very misleading to simply refer to him as a „migrant“ when he was born in Italy and entered the UK legally at age 11 with his mother. He has lived in the UK ever since. However, he retained the Nigerian nationality he had acquired by being born to a Nigerian mother. This is not somebody who came here on a small boat. He came to the UK as a child. The intention after his first offence (serious but not rape) was to deport him to Nigeria, despite him never having been to that country. That makes the decision not to deport him a lot more understandable. It wasn’t a simple matter of him claiming a right to a family life, the original judge decided that, on balance, it would have been a breach of his human rights to deport him to a country that he had no experience of.

      It is too easy (and lazy) to depict this as a namby-pamby judge allowing a simple appeal. It was a complex case and the judge decided based on his specific circumstances.

    Leave A Reply