Untersuchungen zum Verlust von KI-Arbeitsplätzen ignorieren, wie KI das Internet völlig zerstört

Over the last few months, various academics and AI companies have attempted to predict how artificial intelligence is going to impact the labor market. These studies, including a high-profile paper published by Anthropic earlier this month, largely try to take the things AI is good at, or could be good at, and match them to existing job categories and job tasks. But the papers ignore some of the most impactful and most common uses of AI today: AI porn and AI slop.

Anthropic’s paper, called “[Labor market impacts of AI: A new measure and early evidence](https://cdn.sanity.io/files/4zrzovbb/website/3f7fd9d552e66269bdb108e207c5d80531d04b8b.pdf?ref=howtoreadthisch.art),” essentially attempts to find 1:1 correlations between tasks that people do today at their jobs and things people are using Claude for. The researchers also try to predict if a job’s tasks “are theoretically possible with AI,” which resulted in this chart, which has gone somewhat viral and was [included in a newsletter by MSNOW’s Phillip Bump](https://www.howtoreadthisch.art/the-answers-to-five-questions/?ref=404media.co) and [threaded about by tech journalist Christopher Mims](https://bsky.app/profile/mims.bsky.social/post/3mh4cs4yi4s2f?ref=404media.co). ([Because everything is terrible](https://www.actionnetwork.com/lifestyle/will-ai-replace-your-job?ref=404media.co), the research is now also feeding into a gambling website where you can see the apparent odds of having your job replaced by AI.)

In his thread, Mims makes the case that the “theoretical capability” of AI to do different jobs in different sectors is totally made up, and that this chart basically means nothing. Mims makes a good and fair observation: The nature of the many, many studies that attempt to predict which people are going to lose their jobs to AI are all flawed because the inputs must be guessed, to some degree. 

But I believe most of these studies are flawed in a deeper way: They do not take into account how people are actually actually using AI, though Anthropic claims that that is exactly what it is doing.

Not included in any of Anthropic’s research are extremely popular uses of AI such as “create AI porn” and “create AI slop and spam.” These uses are destroying discoverability on the internet, cause cascading societal and economic harms.

Read more [https://www.404media.co/ai-job-loss-research-ignores-how-ai-is-utterly-destroying-the-internet/](https://www.404media.co/ai-job-loss-research-ignores-how-ai-is-utterly-destroying-the-internet/)

When the dust settles, all these LLm’s will have really accomplished is the death of the internet. They might help a few people in some niche way, but the internet will be dead, and the LLM’s training data will be dead too.

Good. Maybe people will realize how awful the internet has become.

So many bots and scammers.

We need an internet 2.0

AI is just a plagiarism machine that refuses to be held accountable

But AI is making the tech bros hard. That’s all that matters.

I hate to say it guys, but there needs to be a ‚clear internet‘ based off ID’s so you can prove you are a human being.

We’re out of challenges that bots can’t solve but people can. CAPTCHA will not work any more.

You can still go ID-less anywhere else, but not on ’normie‘ socials. And a broad crackdown on bots in general. This is the collapse of civilization type shit.

lol, AI isn’t destroying the internet, corporations are changing the tool to fit their needs.

Don’t forget when Pinterest ruined google searches.

AI is destroying spcial media and political ebtertainment. Honestly, let it die. The internet will still function.