Share.

    6 Kommentare

    1. 267aa37673a9fa659490 on

      > The lawsuit goes on to include examples of responses from OpenAI’s models side by side with Britannica’s text, in which entire passages appear to match word for word.

      And of course the article doesn’t list even one example.

    2. justaguytrying2getby on

      This whole AI thing is being built backwards. The get rich quick style. Torrent a bunch of shit for a fast build up instead of taking the time to blockchain or tokenize everything so it can all be credited back to the author accordingly. Easier said than done, but nothing worth while comes that easy.

    3. soxxxxxxfan on

      The website genius already failed to sue Google for copying its content (song lyrics) and showing it at the top of its search results. They even alternated between straight and curly apostrophes and showed Google’s summary copied their apostrophes, but courts didn’t care because genius didn’t own the copyright to the lyrics themselves. I doubt this case will go anywhere.

    4. Ok-Replacement9595 on

      Wait till Wikipedia gets in on this. I swear every AI answer is a summary of Wikipedia articles.

    Leave A Reply