Demokraten wollen Ermittlungen gegen Kristi Noem einleiten, weil sie unter Eid gelogen hat

https://newrepublic.com/post/207810/democrats-investigate-kristi-noem-lying-under-oath

38 Kommentare

  1. jizz_bismarck on

    This is no surprise; Trump hires people based on their ability to lie on his behalf. 

  2. hcwhitewolf on

    Every single Trump appointee that testified before Congress prior to Senate approval has lied under oath. It’s not even that hard to prove.

  3. > The recommendation will cite at least four responses Noem provided under oath, including her answers to questions about the $220 million ad campaign that reportedly got her fired. Speaking before the committees, Noem had crumbled under scrutiny regarding the multimillion-dollar ad contract she’d awarded to an eight-day-old company.

    I guess she didn’t get the memo that all money laundering is supposed to be done through TrumpCoin

  4. Good. It’s not about her. It’s about setting an example for the rest.

  5. Ancient_Popcorn on

    Can we also open investigations into the rest of this administration for lying under oath?

  6. I love this for her. And for Patel and Bondi, once the House chamber has shifted control.

    Loyalty to Trump is never rewarded. I would say, „when is MAGA going to learn?“ but the answer seems to be never.

    We simply have to make the lesson stick.

  7. GuerrillaKane on

    Good! Make it so these people can never “work” in the government again. Stop the profiting from tax payers.

  8. TheHomersapien on

    Ah yes, just like when they impeached the orange rapist for making Congress butthurt while ignoring the real crimes.

    How about impeachment for detaining and deporting citizens without due process?

  9. Emotional-Channel-42 on

    She should be sent to a foreign penitentiary for life imprisonment for her crimes. No due process, just how she likes it. 

  10. What „investigation“ is even necessary? It was bald faced, in broad daylight, directly in front of everyone there. Is that not open and shut enough for them?

  11. stephanhamrick on

    As they should.

    Anyone, who lies under oath, should be investigated.

    ANYONE.

  12. meowmeowgang44 on

    All it takes is for one of these assholes to be held accountable and everyone will then realize they are touchable by the rule of law.

  13. i_am_a_real_boy__ on

    Their „move“ was writing Bondi a letter. I’m sure she’ll get right on that.

  14. copperreppoc on

    Late is better than never, but it’s been 12 days since the last hearing on March 4. The news cycle has moved on.

    These are 9 senators from the same caucus. It took them nearly TWO WEEKS to send the DOJ this recommendation.

    This is exactly why people criticize Democrats as being ineffective. Even when there’s a flagrant violation of the law that all of us see with our own eyes, it takes them 2-3 business days to realize it themselves and 6-7 business days to file meaningless paperwork on it.

  15. seyheystretch on

    They all do! Patel, Bondi and the Press Secretary (though I think she doesn’t count because on under oath)

  16. SiskiyouSavage on

    She isn’t in the job anymore. This is closing the barn door after the horse has set fire to the ranch.

  17. MobileArtist1371 on

    Don’t get your hopes up for anything soon.

    > We have low expectations that Pam Bondi’s partisan Justice Department will pursue a perjury investigation into Kristi Noem.
    >
    > Unfortunately for her, the statute of limitations is five years.
    >
    > This case can be pursued by the next Administration.

    https://x.com/JudiciaryDems/status/2033577408759042405

  18. Historical_Bend_2629 on

    Noem is not pleasant, but throw out the obvious corruption from the rotten head. Your hands are not washed if you don’t impeach, convict and remove the source of rot.

  19. Jnebontheweb on

    Remember guys we need to cut the snakes head off and it isn’t Donald Trump. Israel is the true snake controlling us like a puppet master

  20. at this point, I’m numb to the possibility that this gets us anywhere. Go for it. I’ll vote for anybody who runs on a platform of bringing these ghouls to justice. But someone has to prove to me that past performance doesn’t indicate future results.

  21. Because lying under oath doesn’t matter to Republicans, as long as it’s them doing the lying.

Leave A Reply