Schlagwörter
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Karte
Karten
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Map
Maps
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Polen
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
Ukraine War Video Report
UkraineWarVideoReport
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News

34 Kommentare
I love when groups try to attack the government for something but just end up making them look better.
Guess you don’t want anything inflammatory when it comes to petrol!!!!
‘No profiteering’
‘WELL FUCK THAT NOISE!!’
Looks good, nice one.
Dear god how childish. Just an excuse to dodge a meeting where they will be told they can’t do what they want at the expense of the British public ffs
Asda and Tesco petrol prices have shot up to around 137p a litre where I live. Places like Esso and Texaco are up past 140p. This is up from about 131p average a few weeks back before Trump fucked up the Middle East.
The meeting is back on, probably because they realised it made them look petulant.
[https://news.sky.com/story/politics-latest-mandelson-files-starmer-labour-trump-12593360?postid=11269048#liveblog-body](https://news.sky.com/story/politics-latest-mandelson-files-starmer-labour-trump-12593360?postid=11269048#liveblog-body)
When about 70p a ltr is tax and they where about to dump another 5p on
I’d have a hard time talking about me profiteering if I was them to.
Making them walk out or giving them an excuse to is bad management what ever way you slice it.
But I suppose they tried unlike in the Russia crisis when they used tax payers money to pay the suppliers which in turn made record profits.
Dammed if you do comes to mind
I mean, it’s just a cover because they are absolutely profiteering already. Most supermarket petrol stations buy in fuel two weeks in advance, at least. The moment the war started prices were up everywhere. They just are hoping to dodge any kind of accountability. The only ones who can be excused are local independents who will not have good deals, and buy on a daily basis.
So the „Inflammatory language“ used was accusing petrol retailers of ripping off consumers after them jacking up the prices for fuel that they would have paid for months a go at a much lower cost. And them pulling out of the meeting is because their demands of no media coverage wasn’t met so that they could „explain“ how it all works in private. Yeah get fucked.
EDIT: Oh they’ve changed their minds and are back in again….
Ok. Then we’ll see them in front of a select committee where lying could get you locked up.
> A meeting between petrol retailers and the chancellor is back on, less than an hour after the retailers announced they were pulling out, Sky News understands.
Didn’t think I would ever say this about current Labour but good on them for at the very least standing up to these companies with their words
Up like a rocket down like a feather. Pure profiteering.
Go on Rachel tell those wankers to fuck off. This is what I voted Labour for.
Reading the Sky News headline and you’d think that Rachel Reeves was threatening to have them beaten up, or something.
What, dear Ms Reeves upsetting anyone – who would have thought that?
The same retailers that raised prices when the government was cutting fuel duty, pocketing the difference…. I’d have some inflammatory language for them, too.
News is out of date now:
A meeting between petrol retailers and the chancellor is back on, less than an hour after the retailers announced they were pulling out, Sky News understands.
The fact the government is getting criticism for this really is a perfect demonstration of how hostile the media have become to this government. How anyone can see it as a bad thing government want to question petrol retailers about profiteering is nuts.
The reaction to this must be to roll out renewables, storage, sensible EVs and recharging networks at even greater pace than now.
If they have to raise prices then whatever. It’s the slow gradual lowering of them after things ease that upsets me as that’s profiteering.
Me thinks the petrol companies are just being greedy!! Don’t like being held to account for their corporate greed….
In reality, retailer profit is only a small part and percentage of fuel prices (8% according to the BBC). Now, that could and should be lower, but government taxes, charges, levies, duties and VAT is like over half the cost of fuel and petrol!
Green charges, levies and duties; VAT is charged on fuel and petrol; fuel duty is similarly enormous.
Then, we have the political choices of this government and previous governments not taking advantage of North Sea oil too.
Starmer, Reeves and Miliband are deflecting. Our petrol and fuel prices, among the highest in the entire world (and certainly in the developed world and Europe too) are down to government and political choices – choices this government (the Labour party) are continuing to make.
Anyone think petrol retailers give even the slightest darn about their employees? Anyone?
Don’t call our war profiteering war profiteering
Call it war stock price stabilisation
Remember the last fuel price hike…”unavoidable” iirc.
Then they all reported record profits.
No fucking shit!
100% the government fault for attempting to stop them from ripping off their customers, which they are obviously doing when pushing prices up 10-20% on stock they had BEFORE the oil price spiked.
Reeves and Millibands fault for using language that is far too soft and understating the extend of the petrol retailer rip-offs.
Surely the CMA will act this time boosting competition, on top of their hugely sucessful online price requirement, by threatening more hard words.
Heavan forbid the CMA require petrol retailers bring prices down as quickly as they put them up???
“Rachel Reeves bullies and shames hardworking retailers trying to support us with fuel in our hour of need 🙏 “ – The Mail probably
No different to corner shops charging a tenner for bog roll/hand sanitiser in February/early March 2020.
See the follow-up?
They deleted the tweet, and the meeting was back on less than an hour later.
Where’s the front page breaking news bit, you might ask? It is still showing the original tweet.
I don’t get the problem, petrol is flammable afterall
So I up fill every week £60. Day after the price shock £80. So yes you are price gouging you fuckin capitalist monsters.
It isn’t negative margins when the cost of petrol goes up quickly – up it is the same petrol that the oil company delivered the day before.
One could argue it is priced at replacement cost – but then it that were the case – why when oil prices fall does it take so it takes so long for petrol prices to fall…
We pay 53% tax on petrol plus 20% VAT on top of that. If the government wanted to talk about gouging they should self reflect a little first.