Close Menu
    Welt

    Nach Angaben der iranischen Revolutionsgarde wurde ein US-Flugzeugträger bei dem Angriff schwer beschädigt


    Nach Angaben der iranischen Revolutionsgarde wurde ein US-Flugzeugträger bei dem Angriff schwer beschädigt

    https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/iran-s-irgc-says-uss-abraham-lincoln-aircraft-carrier-sustained-heavy-damage-in-attack/3862531

    Share.
    View 38 Comments

    38 Kommentare

    1. Barry_144 on

      western media reports that Iranian ship approached the carrier and US helicopter hit the ship with two missiles

    2. call-the-wizards on

      IRGC has practically already claimed Tel Aviv has been gloriously nuked and America is in flames. They’re soon going to declare total victory and a global Shia Islamic Ummah. From a bunker 100 meters underground, as bombs explode overhead.

    4. Ble_h on

      I know it’s bullshit because they are only reporting the carrier was damaged. The carrier is at the center of the battle group, it would be the last ship to sustain heavy damage.

    7. Wide-Teach1451 on

      Centcom Said it was fire at the laundry deck. Believe whoever you want . It’s fog of war.

    9. vaskelovo on

      Oh that wasn’t from Iran’s attack, the toilets were backed up after Taco Tuesday. Still getting patched up.

    11. HurlinVermin on

      Pictures or it didn’t happen.

      Probably knocked a small antenna mast off or something in reality.

    13. Euclidisthebomb on

      Call me skeptical but I think I will need more then just the IRGC statement on this to believe it. It would be a monumental failure of its defense screen if any missiles or drones made it to the inner core of a carrier group. Heads would roll, a lot of them.

    16. roam3D on

      They already said 2 times that they destroyed it. 3rd time is the charm or what? LOL

    17. Fordinghamster on

      If Iran was able to touch an aircraft carrier it would be the biggest US military setback of my lifetime and I was born in 1969.

    18. weirdal1968 on

      I sincerely cannot wait for the IRGC to post an AI slop image of the carrier in flames. Didn’t Argentina make a similar claim during the Falklands War?

    19. RSN_Kabutops on

      The boat sustained more damage after enchilada night in the chow hall I assure you

    20. hoochymamma on

      ROFL, Iran propaganda is next level shit – this humiliated peasants really try hard to rewrite reality do they ?

    22. Apart_Ad1537 on

      Lmao, the fact that anyone believes this nonsense is hilarious. Iran couldn’t damage a US aircraft carrier if they owned one, this is like the 50th time they’ve claimed they blew one up since the war started

    23. EfficiencyIVPickAx on

      If Iran disabled an USN Carrier, you wouldn’t hear about it until after Trump dropped nukes.

    24. RLewis8888 on

      It’s a lie-off between Trump and Iran. I’m not sure where to place my bet.

    27. Photodan24 on

      I’m 90% sure this is complete crap, but that’s the problem with a White House that obviously, unapologetically LIES to us as political strategy. You never know just who to trust. Even with a fabrication as grandiose as this, in my mind, there’s still a double-digit chance it’s true.

      It makes the American public even easier for other governments to manipulate.

    29. number39utopia on

      I take this with a grain of salt, Iran has talked out their ass before. Not not to say they can’t but rather more of a „I’ll believe it when I see it“ situation

    31. Warburton_Expat on

      I don’t believe it, but I do believe it would be a good strategic move. Risky – if the Americans genuinely lost a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier they’d probably go nuts and actually nuke the guys who sank it. But strategically and diplomatically it’d be as significant as the RN losing its battleships was in WWII. The USN would immediately have to withdraw its other carriers from anywhere near the conflict.

      Likewise the Argentines really should have attack the RN carrier in the Falklands. I’m reminded of Machiavelli saying that most men do not know how to be wholly good or wholly evil, and do half-measures. If you’re going to go to war and be mostly destroyed as a regime anyway, you may as well go all-in.

      I wouldn’t have fucked around attacking a dozen neighbouring countries. I understand why they did it – create economic chaos, and cleave the Gulf states away from the US – but putting the entire missile force onto a single carrier – shit, *something* would get through, and even if you didn’t sink it, at least badly damage it. And someone would photograph it, and the image of a sinking burning USN carrier would never be forgotten.

    32. barf_seller on

      Gotta take it with a grain of salt, remember they also claim their new leader is not made of cardboard

    35. handsomejack11 on

      Its so funny how much of a joke the US military is…with all the money spent on defense every year.

    37. SnuffleWarrior on

      The first casualty in war is the truth. The sad part of this is I trust Trump the least.

    38. hundredpercenthuman on

      Just so everyone knows, Iran lies almost as much as Trump. Official US military sources are saying a ship approached the Lincoln but was fired upon by USN Destroyers and laughed helicopters. No casualties.

    Leave A Reply