Schlagwörter
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Karte
Karten
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Map
Maps
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Polen
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
Ukraine War Video Report
UkraineWarVideoReport
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News

3 Kommentare
Iceland Government statement: https://www.government.is/diplomatic-missions/embassy-article/2026/03/12/Iceland-intervenes-in-South-Africa-case-at-the-International-Court-of-Justice/
ICJ press release: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20260312-pre-01-00-en.pdf
SS: This is potentially quite a consequential move or an indication of shifting allegiances and interests, with additional western countries breaking ranks and joining Ireland, Belgium and Spain in intervening in the case against Israel. Netherlands may just be a result of the new government, but at least in Iceland’s case i’d suggest it’s as a consequence of recent Israeli policy, given their reasoning relies on a parliamentary vote 3 years ago.
E: Iceland submission https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20260311-int-02-00-en.pdf
Netherlands Submission https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20260311-int-01-00-en.pdf
> Iceland argued that the determination of genocidal intent should not be limited to situations where genocide is the only reasonable inference from the acts committed.
>Instead, Iceland said, the existence of other possible intentions alongside genocidal intent should not prevent the court from determining that genocide has occurred.
Iceland is essentially admitting the evidence doesn’t meet the legal standard for genocide, so their solution is to simply lower the standard. If you have to argue that ‚other reasonable explanations‘ should be ignored, you aren’t proving a crime—you’re just engineering a foregone conclusion.
Imagine a murder trial where the prosecution says, ‚Sure, there’s a perfectly reasonable explanation for why the defendant was there, but we should just ignore that so we can get the conviction we want.‘ That’s Iceland’s logic here. Clown show.
The more the merrier.