Close Menu
    Politics

    Trumps innerer Kreis kann ihn nicht zügeln. Und sein Geisteszustand wird in Frage gestellt

    Share.
    View 26 Comments

    26 Kommentare

    1. theipaper on

      WASHINGTON DC – When [Donald Trump](https://inews.co.uk/topic/donald-trump?ico=in-line_link) returned to the White House in January 2024, he and his top advisers believed they had hit upon a surefire way to ensure that, this time around, he would not be talked out of anything he wanted to do.

      The plan: to surround himself with dyed-in-the-wool loyalists from within his [Make America Great Again](https://inews.co.uk/topic/maga?ico=in-line_link) and America First movements. There would be no voices of dissent, no moderating influences and – as the US President looks around his Cabinet table – definitely no [Ed Milibands](https://inews.co.uk/topic/ed-miliband?ico=in-line_link) ready to challenge and dissuade him from wading blindly into geopolitical crises and military engagements.

      Arguably, no single event has revealed the success of the Trump’s strategy more than the US’s ongoing “major combat operations” against [Iran](https://inews.co.uk/topic/iran?ico=in-line_link).

      Without a single restraining voice in his ear, he has taken full advantage of his top lieutenants’ green light to [assassinate Iran’s supreme leader](https://inews.co.uk/news/trump-israels-killing-khamenei-played-out-4266623?ico=in-line_link), [destabilise the Middle East](https://inews.co.uk/news/world/why-gulf-states-not-fighting-iran-pounded-missiles-4278193?ico=in-line_link), put the lives of US troops at risk, send the global price of oil soaring and leave the US at a [greater risk](https://www.cfr.org/articles/iran-and-terrorism-what-the-u-s-strikes-could-mean-for-homeland-security) of terror attacks at home.

      A casual observer can see Trump’s strategy playing out on television daily. His “Cabinet meetings” are not proper Cabinet meetings – they are [made-for-television spectacles](https://inews.co.uk/news/world/trump-war-reality-tv-show-4273417?ico=in-line_link) in which the President goes around the table and invites praise and plaudits from sycophantic members of his inner circle who, at times, appear to be competing to massage his ego with ever-greater dollops of baby oil.

      In the run-up to the recent US-Israeli air strikes on Iran, US Vice President [JD Vance](https://inews.co.uk/opinion/jd-vance-vanishing-before-our-eyes-4275474?ico=in-line_link) reportedly came the closest to warning Trump of the dangers inherent in pursuing [a seemingly strategy-free war](https://inews.co.uk/news/world/trump-no-plan-iran-will-greatest-failure-yet-4266633?ico=in-line_link).

      Vance had assured the public back in October 2024 that it would be folly for the US to start bombing Tehran. “It would be a huge distraction of resources. It would be massively expensive to our country,” he [told podcaster](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPlqID3zv4k) Tim Dillon during the presidential campaign.

      However, in White House discussions last month, Vance appeared to have folded the moment it became apparent that Trump’s mind was already set. “Go big and go fast,” was Vance’s [reported advice](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/02/us/politics/trump-war-iran-israel.html) to the President, which at least leaves him able to claim that he warned his boss about attacking with insufficient force or pace to get the job done.

      In Trump’s second term, there are no experts within his National Security Council willing to present an alternative thesis to the President’s preconceived notions – they were all rooted out the moment [Joe Biden](https://inews.co.uk/topic/joe-biden?ico=in-line_link) left office.

      This time around, there are not even any first-term figures such as [John Kelly](https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/trump-what-starmer-needs-know-win-over-3547255?ico=in-line_link), the former White House chief of staff, or former national security advisers General HR McMaster or John Bolton, who, with varying degrees of fealty, would prostrate themselves before Trump but also occasionally tell him he was wrong.

    2. WontThinkStraight on

      I disagree. They can rein him in because he’s a gullible idiot. They just choose not too.

    4. PrettySisterKisser on

      I might be drinking enough copium that investors might be pressuring the cabinet to invoke the 25th.

    5. Lazy-Ad-9969 on

      The fact that the media is acting like his mental decline is some brand new shocking revelation is actually insane to me tbh. the guy has been giving completely incoherent word salad speeches about sharks and batteries for months now dude.

    6. Hungry-Inspector-758 on

      we’ve literally been seeing this exact same headline every week since 2016 ngl. his „inner circle“ is just a revolving door of yes-men and grifters who are too scared to actually tell him no anyway.

    7. Mikethebest78 on

      Yeah his inner circle is about 50/50

      A. Those that see him as an easy way to make money and don’t want to rock the boat

      B. Those who are to busy licking his boots to actually do anything.

    8. Zeebie_ on

      I think it’s worse than that, I think he being puppeted by his inner circle to live out their fantasy of a powerful USA without risking their own skin.

    10. GreenBucket120 on

      It is interesting that those within his inner circle, members of his administration and the elected members of the Republican Party as discrete groups individually and collectively would presumably have the means to pull the rug from under him but that’s not happening and he’s unlikely to go of his own volition.

      That begs 2 questions.

      Firstly, are his inner circle/administration continuing to protect him so they can hold on to the power he’s given them since they might otherwise fade into the background?

      Secondly, is the Republican Party afraid that any action to rein him in will ultimately be seen as an acknowledgment of failure in government and thereby a guarantee of a power shift to the Democrats in the midterms?

      That midterm shift might already on the cards.

      It’s a given that Trump has to go but what then?

      A Trump removal presumably by enforced resignation would see Vance elevated to the role according to the line of succession but he presents as ineffective at best and might struggle to get a solid core of good people around him having been little more than a lapdog in his role as VP parroting his masters words including insults and in doing so possibly offending just about everyone at home and abroad.

      I can’t see him undergoing any significant transformation if elevated and the echoes of the cult of personality that marked Trumps reign will make any change difficult.

      If Vance does end up in the Oval Office and the Democrats have a majority in both houses it will be interesting to see how the echoes of the MAGA movement in particular respond.

      Will both parties be able to get their supporters to remain calm and allow the business of government to carry on unhindered by conspiracy theories and false allegations of impropriety and vote rigging?

      There can be no denying that undoing the damage caused by Trump’s gutting of various government agencies, legislative changes and overbearing treatment of former allies leaves a lot of work to be done and it’s going to take a lot of effort on both sides to be able to gain traction after what has been experienced since the 2025 inauguration.

    11. Independent-Self371 on

      He’s the same bumbling , lying idiot from the first term. Did 77m people just not remember the first term at all. Same tool of a sub-human but now with pedo-power. There is no one reining him in, his “inner circle” is just trying to figure out how to ride the wave and get richer, country be damned.

    12. Theonewho_hasspoken on

      My greatest fear is that he has the nuke codes and the stupidity to fire them for dumbass reasons.

    16. verone3784 on

      Considering the USAF have apparently just deployed an E-6B Mercury to the middle east, I’d say they’re all full of shit and are complicit in what’s going on.

      They could put a stop to this easily, but it’s all about self-interest without giving a fuck about the consequences.

    19. BlurryRogue on

      Then oust him. Until then, I fail to believe anybody is questioning anything.

    20. mikeholczer on

      The 25th amendment makes it very easy, if they actually wanted to rein him in.

    22. OrganizedChaos1979 on

      They could have him reined in today if they wanted to. He’s their useful idiot. The entire administration is made up of all of the worst people. They can all get fucked, and not in the fun way.

    23. Shadowholme on

      Bullshit. This is just more deflection to avoid responsibility.

      There are rules in place to remove leaders in these exact situations – specifically the 25th Amendment. This is EXACTLY what it was written for! Congress can also do their jobs and say no to the man-baby as well.

      So no, they don’t get to say ‚we can’t stop him‘ when they refuse to use the tools expressly designed to stop him.

      Because of course you can’t stop him if you refuse to try!

    24. TheSecretofBog on

      The House and Senate can reign him in, they just choose not to. Same can be said for SCOTUS.

    26. Blackhawk127 on

      Last 2 republican presidents were the most gullible and easily manipulated in modern history 

    Leave A Reply