Share.

    7 Kommentare

    1. Wheres_my_wank_sock on

      I agree with you in principle, but the world isn’t this black and white. I’m a Blue no matter who Democrat. Let me start with that. Some of the things I see the right do I find morally reprehensible. There is no cooperation to be had with people I consider to be evil. It goes beyond politics; it’s about what I consider right and wrong. If I’ve sworn off members of my own family, do I really think there is any compromise to be had with strangers?

    2. Remember that the ultra rich are the right wing. That’s literally part of its definition, consolidation of political power into a ruling class.

      You’re all just blinded by right wing propaganda into believing like fools that the opposition to the far right party in the US is anything other than a center-right machine.

    3. ghostface8081 on

      The average person has more to lose from the bottom 10% of society than the top 1%

    4. SnooFloofs8781 on

      It isn’t even all ultra-wealthy people. It is a collection of people in central banking/big business/big investment (Blackrock/Vanguard/State Street.) While most of the population in the US has devolved into red vs. blue tribalism (in the last 40 years there have been four presidential candidates–one a serious contender, one a two-time president, and the other two not major candidates–who were not owned by this banking oligarchy: Ross Perot, Ron/Rand Paul and Trump, while every other candidate, both Democrat and Republican has been owned by the banking oligarchy,) what mechanically amounts to a mafia of oligarchs, who bribe a lot of politicians and are majority shareholders in most of the media and practically every business, company or service that you deal with. Over a century ago, this group of oligarchs set out to bankrupt (with crushing debt) practically every country in the world so that no country could act politically without their say so. This is the group who (by proxy or proxies) offed JFK and Lincoln and tried to have Andrew Jackson shot (all three either interfered with, stopped or circumvented privately-owned central banking, like the modern-day „Federal“ Reserve.) Those three presidents all halted gargantuan sums of money from flowing into the hands of the international central bankers. This group has been having presidents shot at for the last 200 or so years.

      Mechanically, this group of oligarchs functions as a mafia and influences or controls the direction of everything from modern medicine, governments, the news media, Hollywood, education, the pharmaceutical industry, the mental health industry, the food industry and basically most major businesses or corporations that we deal with in the marketplace. They handle your 401k or 403b. There’s a reason why alternative medicine doesn’t get a fair shake. There’s a reason why over 60% of the US population doesn’t believe the Oswald loan-gunman fairy tale and the media gaslights the public into the idea that any alternative idea regarding the JFK assassination is „conspiracy theory.“ The term „conspiracy theory,“ while it existed in usage before was a term rarely used and only became highly popularized by the influence of the CIA through the mainstream media in order to combat alternative theories regarding the Kennedy assassination. The CIA, which JFK wanted to dismantle, was caught in the 70s and admitted to a government panel as having its operatives working within the mainstream media and helping to influence The narrative of the news (see operation Mockingbird,) but nothing of great effect ever came of it. Just like very little will come of the Epstein data that was recently released because there is a two-tier justice system. One system applies to the oligarchy („our owners“ as George Carlin put it) and the normal system applies to everyone else. Many members of this oligarchy are above the law because mechanically they are a mafia and function outside of the justice system because the leaders of the group itself keep a low enough profile. Some people at the top include the Rothchilds and Rockefellers.

      This group of international bankers owned the central bank that King George owed debt to and are a lot of the reason that the colonies that became America were being taxed. The American colonies revolted against the British government for taxation without representation. That taxation demanded by King George was being paid toward the debt owed to the international bankers and the Central Bank of England back then. In other words, people generally acknowledge that we revolted against the British crown but a lot of people don’t realize that we were actually revolting against central bankers without realizing that those bankers have been the hidden cause behind many military actions of quite a few countries going back hundreds and hundreds of years.

      Today, most of our representatives don’t represent us and we’re still getting taxed and the taxes are by far worse than ever before and more extreme. Political bribery is legalized or achieved indirectly with insider trading or by funneling money to family members. Ron Paul laughed when the Democrats tried to impeach Trump over a supposed quid pro quo with Ukraine, regarding Ukraine looking into Hunter Biden’s corrupt connection with Burisma, an energy company that was already suspected of corruption by Ukraine and was being investigated by the Ukrainian attorney general before Trump got involved in politics.

      Before private central banks, the crown in England controlled the amount of money in circulation with tally sticks.

      Eisenhower warned us about the industrial-military complex. What the gentleman who composed Eisenhower’s speech failed to point out is that the privately-owned central banks loan money at interest to countries whenever a country wants more money. War is good for business for the weapons manufacturers, the government (who can launder tax dollars and pay astronomical sums for various services or products) and privately-owned central banks. Loans are great for the fractional-reserve bankers because it is the way in which they derive their income. There is a reason why usury, such as our modern fractional-reserve-banking system, and predatory lending has been banned throughout history as being corrupt and immoral because it creates a slave state for the population and governments alike.

    5. Ya’ll don’t like the truth, but the only side fighting the ultra rich are leftists. Not Liberals. Not conservatives.

      Leftists. I say this because most of you don’t know the difference between a lib and leftist. The right calls everyone a „radical“ leftist to convince you that they are the same thing.

      If you want to know who your enemies are, just look at who gets mad when you say the phrase „Eat the Rich“. Just look at who gets angry when you suggest that we should tax the rich more and tax the poor less.

    6. Chadlite_Rutherford on

      Instead of saying ultra rich you need to be specific. Blackrock and the Federal Reserve, the Rothschilds and Rockefellers. These families and institutions have literally trillions of dollars at their disposal and control nearly everything in existence.

      Democrats are obsessed that even a single billionaire existing has enormous power and influence ( they are still small fish/controlled), and Republicans think any wealth remanagement leads straight to communism.

      Epstein was just one of many agents of the Rothschilds and yet the entire world was at his fingertips, and even billionaires ( the supposed villains ) were under his blackmail. The few that control the world have an amount of money that is difficult to believe unless you understand the history of central banking.

    Leave A Reply