Share.

11 Kommentare

  1. My gut feels like this video is fake. Doesn’t the camera shake feel too smooth and algorithmic? Doesn’t the smoke cloud look like stock footage and not feel weighty/thick enough to justify being black in color? Isn’t the short length of the video and center framing of the subject suspiciously AI-like?

    Edit: I understand the video was geolocated by bellingcat. I don’t think that necessarily means this video isn’t fake. There’s nothing stopping someone from using footage from that area and overlaying the missile impact in post. The original source of the video is state-sponsored media (which doesn’t mean it’s fake, but worth keeping in mind).

    Edit edit: I’m not saying the US necessarily didn’t bomb the school. I’m just saying this particular video feels fishy.

  2. Something moving at that speed would have a lot more motion blur unless the camera was set for an atypically fast shutter speed. Compared to the blur captured while panning around the landscape, the munition (whatever it is) doesn’t seem to match up. Doesn’t feel right to my eye.

    Speaking of feeling right, why would the explosion of an unhardened facility (school) direct the explosion straight up?

    Weird footage.

  3. I noticed that this video had a weird fake feeling right away BEFORE I even knew it was where the girls‘ school was stroke. There is stock scream footage that cuts abruptly at 0:03. It’s the type of scream you hear in movies, the soundfile doesnt even finish its loop…

  4. MelkorUngoliant on

    Children could well have been on fire or bleeding to death when this video was taken.

    USA! USA!

  5. Whether true or not US will say that had MASINT data showing a bunker complex where they were targeting

  6. Sigmar_the_Slayer on

    Considering how Iran regime treats women, no wonder they put girls-only school near a military target.

    Video still looks fake.

Leave A Reply