Share.

    27 Kommentare

    1. Will backfire in kremlin’s face.

      vatniks moved on from being best NATO salesmen, to expanding, along with USA, to best nuclear weapons proliferation salesmen. And it’s only 2026.

    2. HighFlyingCrocodile on

      “Wait, this is not what we agreed on” How ffing hypocrite is that?

    3. Successful-Try-8506 on

      Sure, because abandoning their nuclear weapons worked out so well for Ukraine.

    4. IamInternationalBig on

      So what’s Russia gonna do, invade a NATO country?

      That would be the end of Russia.

      Sorry Russia, you are now irrelevant.

    5. No-Intention-4753 on

      r/russiawarns yes yes, as always. Eat shit Putin, do not attack neighbors and you’ll never experience those defensive measures they put in place, simple as that. 

    6. BillyWillyNillyTimmy on

      This is the Russian equivalent of the Cuban missile crisis. I understand their panic.

      But as we’ve seen, their threats are completely empty, because they cannot afford to start a war with Europe (I do not count NATO as I believe the USA will refuse to come to aid due to Agent Krasnov).

    7. Consistent_Catch9917 on

      Mimimimi.

      We will aim nuclear weapons on you. Oh we already did, well we will aim them extra evily, so better look out …

    8. Stop invading innocent countries and there’s no need for nukes. Let’s not pretend Russia didn’t cause this themselves.

    9. Russia has no more leverage over this. The entire world remembers what happened to Ukraine after they gave them to Russia for security guarantees.

    10. I think Russia needs to realise that the potential nukes we might be getting wouldn’t be Russian ones, so backfiring isn’t a real concern.

    11. Wineandbikes on

      Don’t do what we don’t want you to do, otherwise we won’t like what you are doing…

    12. fiendishrabbit on

      Should have thought of that Russia before you blatantly started breaking treaties and agreements with your neighbours.

      The war in Ukraine and the end of Finlandization is a prime example of the FAFO principle on an international level.

    13. Finland is not about to host nukes. That’s not what the change to the law is about.

    14. I think it’s only fair, Russia is hosting nukes on the other side of the border so this just balances things out.

    15. Many-Gas-9376 on

      It wasn’t a move to „host“ nuclear weapons. Not going to comment further when even the headline is a lie.

    16. Don’t put up a fence and cameras or we will be forced to break into your home, meth head neighbor warns

    17. ProfessionalAd352 on

      The irony of Russia warning it will backfire when their actions pushed Finland into NATO and to host nuclear weapons.

    Leave A Reply