Quellen zufolge teilten die USA dem Vereinigten Königreich vor dem Angriff auf den Iran keine Einzelheiten mit
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/05/us-did-not-share-details-with-the-uk-before-attacking-iran-sources-say?CMP=fb_gu&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=Iwb21leAQWKXpleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAwzNTA2ODU1MzE3MjgAAR7jlEtHTcGPinxp-pbu5hVIvYLnVyZJz2OSgngj3Xk8upbun4Vqyi_E00E98w_aem_hyoM-M4733Ax_RniOBoKgA
Von Codydoc4
14 Kommentare
Said as if they aren’t making it up as they go along. What would they share? there is no detail to the plan.
As multiple people in the administration have said they went to war because Israel was going to do it anyway.
Trump acting recklessly, who would have thought. And there he is rating his war 15/10. He’s a fucking liability who put his allies troops at huge risk. If he wants the USA to act independently then kick them out of NATO.
It’s an open warfare improv‘?
More seriously… Now that there’s talk of boots on the ground: where are those troops?
Before Irak troops where nearby months in advance weren’t they.
Well that’s a blessing in disguise for Starmer he can honestly say I had no idea they were about to start this shit show next time he is asked. Much better to be totally out of this dumpster fire loop as the US is now trying to find some form of off ramp and Hesgeth is still going on about boots on the ground and Americans being warriors etc.
I suspect its not going to end well for anyone involved and Starmer must be quietly pleased he stayed out of it all.
If you read the article it turns out the US _did_ share details with the UK before attacking Iran.
You can’t share advance details of something you did on a whim.
The times had a report by a ex foreign office member of staff that quit last week.
He said they knew for weeks it was happening.
But Trump expects a Churchillian Starmer and the „patriots“ seem to agree.
I think this is what’s really different about the current war. In the past the US would have bothered to make a case to the UK as they cared about having countries like the UK on board with them as they believed it help legitimise their actions. The US would have done the diplomacy bit for the PR side of their war but the current administration does not believe it needs to do the touchy feely stuff and just thinks everyone should do as they say.
Going on past UK governments actions I actually think the UK would have totally co-operated with US requirements if the US had bothered to make their case. The difference is the current US administration is just very weak diplomatically and thinks it can bully its way to every result it wants.
Yet the Media and Reform/Tories are trying to destroy Starmer for not being ready to defend multiple places in the Middle East and Cyprus with one boat.
Also the fact we have only one anti-missile boat is on the Tories budget cutting.
Well would you? The uk wouldve probably warned iran
Given that Rubio implied the US only got involved because the Israelis were going to attack anyway and they didn’t want to get bombed by Iran, I’m not surprised. It seems they didn’t know they were attacking until the last minute!
Trump looks like he wants to kiss Starmer in that pic.
Have you ever had one of those friends who mostly seemed ok, but has a weird violent side that occasionally comes out. And then one day, without warning he goes and picks a fight with someone, for no good reason, and then afterwards berates you for not immediately joining in with the kicking he was administering?
That’s kind of how it feels being ‚friends‘ with the US right now.
At some point you have to realise that you need to walk away from friendships with violent nuts, or they will inevitably take you down with them.