Carney sagt, er unterstütze Iran-Angriffe „mit Bedauern“

He shouldn’t support them at all. 

The US should never be cheered on for violating international law

I encourage anyone who hasn’t who is peeved to send an email to the prime minister’s office

>and said while he supports the strikes, it is a position he takes „with regret“.

What does this even mean? You either support the strikes or you don’t. You can also condemn the strikes while also condemning Iran’s backwards, theocratic regime. I don’t like a lot of countries out there, but that doesn’t mean I want to see them get bombed at Israel’s behest