Close Menu
    Politik

    Pierre Poilievre schlägt ein neues anglophones Bündnis vor, das Trumps Amerika ausschließt


    Pierre Poilievre schlägt ein neues anglophones Bündnis vor, das Trumps Amerika ausschließt

    https://www.thestar.com/news/pierre-poilievre-proposes-new-anglophone-alliance-that-excludes-trumps-america/article_35a421e5-f63e-4ac4-9540-37444691c72b.html

    View 6 Comments

    6 Kommentare

    1. cannibaltom on

      >Specifically, Poilievre proposes the four members of a new partnership would adopt harmonized rules related to professional credential recognition, product approvals, labour mobility, defence procurement, and energy policy, including critical minerals development.

      >It would require “automatic professional recognition” to ensure doctors, nurses or engineers licensed in one country could practice in all four.” Poilievre admitted it would require Canada’s provinces to sign on, but he added, “they need doctors. If someone can perform heart surgery in Sydney, Australia, they should be able to do so in Sydney, Nova Scotia.”

      >It would ensure “regulatory presumption of equivalence” meaning, Poilievre said, that a product approved in one country is approved in all four. “If a drug or auto part is safe in London, England, it should be safe in London, Ontario.”

      >It would lay out a “skilled mobility framework” that should make it easier for high-skilled workers to move among the four countries, filling shortages and boosting economic growth at home, he said.

      >It would integrate defence procurement, he said, to “ensure more competition and better collaboration, delivering stronger capabilities to our armed forces at better value for taxpayers.”

      >Finally, it would set out a critical minerals and energy pact that would support all four nations’ modern defence capacity and, he suggested, lower prices for “our allies.”

      Genuinely some of the best policy ideas I’ve seen come from Poilievre. Provinces (Quebec and Alberta now) signing on would be an obstacle as he alludes to.

    2. MTL_Dude666 on

      An „anglophone alliance“ would reject 85% of people living in Europe. Another language-related stupidity.

      The year is 2026. Your native language is not the main component in international relations.

    3. Feynyx-77-CDN on

      Clueless as usual, Pierre. Trade deals and alliances outside of the USA was exactly what Carney and the Liberals were elected for and itz exactly what they are doing…. don’t need the failed leader taking vacations pretending to speak for Canada.

    4. bandersnatching on

      Pierre is full of what he thinks are good ideas, but has no idea how to implement them. If this is a good idea, why hasn’t anyone implemented it? Is anyone even interested in doing so? There are maybe twenty different governments who have to all first align on the value of the proposition and then negotiate their terms.

      I wonder what he’ll think of next!

    5. mrjusting on

      ‚Anglophone Alliance‘ has terrible optics in Quebec, but Poilievre having horrible optics in Quebec is par for the course. He could easily have focused on CANZUK and would have avoided putting his foot in his mouth again.

      Who is giving this guy advice? Why is it always bad?

    6. mummified_cosmonaut on

      This is just a less ambitious version of what had been a passion project among British Conservatives for a hundred years.

      I respect the sentiment, but it still has to make sense.

    Leave A Reply