Interaktive Baumkarte von 99 in den Epstein-Dateien erwähnten Unternehmen, sortiert nach geschätzten Erwähnungen in 12 Datenveröffentlichungen des DOJ. Jedes Unternehmen gibt seine Kategorie, die Anzahl der Erwähnungen, den Kontext aus den Dokumenten und einen Link zum vollständigen Unternehmensprofil an. Epstein-Shell-Entitäten sind von Drittorganisationen getrennt.
Vollständiges Dashboard hier: https://demo.veridion.com/top-epstein-companies/
Von VeridionData
10 Kommentare
**Data source:** DOJ Epstein File releases (Data Sets 1–12), USVI v. JPMorgan Chase filings, House Oversight Committee records, and Bloomberg-authenticated DS9 email corpus. Mention estimates were derived by cross-referencing entity appearances across financial records, legal filings, depositions, correspondence, SARs, and media clippings compiled in the full document corpus.
**Tools:** React, D3.js (treemap layout), and Veridion company data (company name recognition and profiling)
Google is mentioned in almost every email since Jeff used a Gmail account. You can imagine what they know.
Thank you for putting this together! As one note, it would be useful to add some [additional context](https://www.vogue.com/article/victorias-secret-and-jeffrey-epstein-explainer) to L Brands/Victoria Secret around Epstein using his connections to Victoria Secret specifically to “recruit” some of his victims.
now all we have to do is everyone that thinks the connections are nefarious needs to quit their jobs with no notice and quit contributing their hard-earned monies to these organizations. cancel all subscriptions, make no purchases, etc. we all have to do it at the same time so when is good for everyone?
I would expect that some of these companies are mentioned in different contexts than others.
Some of them being mentioned because the people involved were consumers and others because the people involved were shareholders, board members etc.
Reminder the Jamie Dimon – CEO of JPM – said he doesn’t know any details of everyone at JPM working with Epstein.
The famous micro manager Dimon just didn’t hear about that one client pulling in millions more than every other client.
You should be carful with this. Some of these mentions might have nothing to do with the companies being complicit with him, but him simply using their services or whatever.
I mean, Yahoo? Is that because people used Yahoo Mail or Yahoo Finance?
I am not shocked by the prevalence of Finance and Banking companies (how are these even indicated as separate industries?)
I see „Lowes“ and thought to myself „man! I knew that there was no safe haven among the hardware store chains, but I really thought that Lowes was the least bad option vs Home Depot.“ Turns out that this is an entirely different company that concerns itself with hotels, resorts and stuff like that. I certainly would spend a minute to somehow make that clear.
Noooooo! Not my Yahoo. I’ve had my email with them for 24 yeeeeeaaaars! God is dead!
How about a photo gallery of everyone named
r/dataisirrelevant
Counting someone’s yahoo mail address being uses is an egregious example of bad data munging.
Adding a single sentence as „context“ only makes it more obvious.
This is about as useful as charting the word „ode“ because it shows up every time they use the word „model“ and calling it a poetry count.