Share.

    7 Kommentare

    1. fastlaneCanada on

      Even if you don’t like the country, violating their sovereignty is not acceptable. Disappointed in Carney’s response.

    2. His legendary speech at Davos was basically calling international law a sham at this point, and how Canada must adapt by making hard-nosed decisions, rather than stand purely on principle under the assumption that „great powers“ will play fair. He may be forfeiting moral high ground on purpose as part of that philosophy.

      He’s doing the same thing with India. Burying the hatchet on foreign interference and transnational repression in exchange for trade diversification.

    3. People need to stop treating everything as an ideological purity contest and focus on the world of realpolitik that we are clearly moving into

    4. If oppressing millions of Iranians is fine under the guise of international law, then international law is a sham

    5. Illustrious-Ant6998 on

      I’m not sure if Carney’s statements was because he is playing a delicate game and is trying to avoid pissing off (and suffering retribution from) the Americans… Or if he is beholden to the same billionaire oligarchs who are pulling Trump’s strings. Carney’s domestic agenda and decreased rights under his crime bill could indicate that, at least to some extent. Or both, to varying degrees.

      Dont get me wrong; Carney was the best choice. But it has occasionally felt like a deal with the devil to protect us from international pressures, at the cost of domestic rights.

    6. cobra_chicken on

      …. Is the premise that Carney’s opinion on this matters in the slightest?

      If Carney came out against the attacks that would just be another reason Trump reacts badly to us.

      I would rather us pay lip service to the tyrant to the south than for us to virtue signal and harm our economic interests, as either way our opinion means absolutely nothing.

    Leave A Reply