Share.

    15 Kommentare

    1. farrrtttttrrrrrrrrtr on

      If this was a Tesla the headline would say Tesla, any other brand though… nope lol

    2. > when the driver of a Lynk & Co Z20 reportedly issued a voice command that shut off the car’s headlights while in motion. The driver says that caused him to not see the median, causing a crash, and it was all caught on the car’s dashcam.

      > The system apparently interpreted the natural-language request to turn off the car’s interior reading lamps as a request to turn off all of the car’s lights—including the car’s headlights.

      Physical buttons and switches > touchscreens and „vOiCe coNTrOLs“

    3. Mountain_rage on

      China relies heavily on voice chat. Now they get to figure out and fix the edge cases. At least most manufacturers are starting to realize consumers want buttons for core features like headlights, climate control, wipers and such.

    4. intelligentx5 on

      Cars don’t need voice controls. My EQS has it and it’s annoying as fuck.

    5. IntentionalUndersite on

      I don’t think computers are a great idea for engine components.. but that’s just me.

    6. Ah yes, the interface people who’d wish everything ran on voice (too slow)…

      Button and Switch supremacy is here to stay.

    7. MentalDisintegrat1on on

      I can’t be the only one that wants them to still make dumb cars.

      I don’t want a vehicle that works like a cell phone or computer I want a vehicle that’s affordable and reliable with no tech ( outside the legal mandated stuff like backup cams)

    8. This car has stalks behind the steering wheel for shifting (on the right) and at least for the blinkers and wipers (on the left). I would really be surprised if it had zero physical controls for the lights, at least for flashing the high beams.

    9. The actual issue is that the car should not shut off the lights while moving and especially at night no matter what you command it by voice. It’s an implementation issue.

    Leave A Reply