Condemning retaliation and defending international laws are two stances I believe are normal
matchuhuki on
I’m surprised there’s nations Iran shot missiles at that didn’t make a statement against the retaliation
Antique-Ad7635 on
Why is Canada still doing ts. They aren’t next but don’t they realize they are on the list.
Delta_Airlines12345 on
Syria should be yellow
Cosmic_Coconut999 on
Y’all. I’m genuinely confused. Weren’t we doing it to help liberate the citizens? Weren’t they being slaughtered?
cleve452 on
r/mapswithoutnz
Ok_Train_2139 on
What if we changed the poll to:
* Against Donald Trump unilaterally deciding this to do it alone with Israel
* Cautiously ok with any other American president… or American child acting with congressional support
>The Brazilian Government expresses deep concern about the escalation of hostilities in the Gulf region, which represents a serious threat to international peace and security, with potentially far-reaching humanitarian and economic impacts.
>In calling for a halt to offensive military actions, Brazil urges all parties to respect international law and condemns any measures that violate the sovereignty of third-party states or that may escalate the conflict, such as retaliatory actions and attacks against civilian areas. Recalling that legitimate self-defense, as provided for in Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, is an exceptional measure subject to proportionality and causality with the armed attack, Brazil expresses its solidarity with Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Kuwait, and Jordan – targets of retaliatory attacks by Iran on February 28.
>While lamenting the loss of civilian lives, Brazil also expresses its solidarity with the families of the victims. It emphasizes, in this regard, the obligation of States to ensure the protection of civilians, in accordance with International Humanitarian Law.
>Brazil reaffirms that dialogue and diplomatic negotiation constitute the only viable path to overcoming differences and building a lasting solution, with the United Nations playing a central role in the prevention and resolution of conflicts, in accordance with the Charter of San Francisco.
Atothed2311 on
You would think Ukraine would be against war by an aggressor…
This-Wall-1331 on
Based Norway
EDIT: LOL downvoted by pedophiles
israelilocal on
The Palestinian authority condemned Iran
Dockers4flag2035orB4 on
In case anyone was confused
The map clearly shows Iran is against the US/Israeli strikes on Iran.
TheRainOfPain on
Common Norwegian W
No_Emotion4969 on
Is it only Government position?
squirrel_exceptions on
These categories are pretty dodgy.
Norway is against the strikes (red), and have stated that’s due to international law and escalation (blue), and it is also against the Iranian retaliations (purple).
Altruistic_Coast4777 on
International law is super important when you have massacred tens of thousands of unarmed demonstrators. Fuck around and find around. Justice served for oppressed women
WifeLeaverr on
Wow Im surprised that US and Israel is in favor with US and Israel strikes on Iran. I would thought they would be against it.
PaintressLeia on
Very instructive.
Bomboclaat_Babylon on
Canada showing they have no real convictions. I think when Carney said „The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must“ he silently implied, „And the brown people, who cares what happens to them, they aren’t real people anyway…“
Careful-Training-761 on
I would have assumed China would be red
scotte416 on
I can see why Ukraine is the only European nation for this but not sure why they’re the only one really.
Interesting-Ear7344 on
The Gulf cucks are bouta get it too
seenitreddit90s on
Australia?
That seems unlikely.
Original_Griever on
But what does New Zealand think??
wlwsavestheworld on
Correction: Japan agrees and fully support the attack
Does that mean you are expressing support for the U.S. attack?
Minister:
As both the Chief Cabinet Secretary and the Minister for Foreign Affairs have stated, I believe that is the position of the government as a whole.“
matatakakiban on
Orban: Prepare for terrorist threats in Hungary!!!! (You need to fear for your life, I have 42 days left please just FEAR)
rainbowminotaurus on
why africa always grey wtf
mtnsilverpixie on
Lots of us in the US are very much against this fiasco! And we’re tired of Netanyahu too! Ship him and Trump off to Mars!
Lazy-Tomatillo3161 on
Germany, France and the UK mainly condemned the Iranian retaliation.
Basically telling them to stop fighting back. They aren’t in favour of upholding international law, otherwise you’d sanction the US and Israel for violating it again and again.
32 Kommentare
Sooooooooo…. Just sit and watch?
Condemning retaliation and defending international laws are two stances I believe are normal
I’m surprised there’s nations Iran shot missiles at that didn’t make a statement against the retaliation
Why is Canada still doing ts. They aren’t next but don’t they realize they are on the list.
Syria should be yellow
Y’all. I’m genuinely confused. Weren’t we doing it to help liberate the citizens? Weren’t they being slaughtered?
r/mapswithoutnz
What if we changed the poll to:
* Against Donald Trump unilaterally deciding this to do it alone with Israel
* Cautiously ok with any other American president… or American child acting with congressional support
Map is wrong on Brazil’s stance. Here’s the google translated [statement](https://www.gov.br/mre/pt-br/canais_atendimento/imprensa/notas-a-imprensa/escalada-de-hostilidades-no-oriente-medio) of Brazil’s ministry of foreign affairs:
>The Brazilian Government expresses deep concern about the escalation of hostilities in the Gulf region, which represents a serious threat to international peace and security, with potentially far-reaching humanitarian and economic impacts.
>In calling for a halt to offensive military actions, Brazil urges all parties to respect international law and condemns any measures that violate the sovereignty of third-party states or that may escalate the conflict, such as retaliatory actions and attacks against civilian areas. Recalling that legitimate self-defense, as provided for in Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, is an exceptional measure subject to proportionality and causality with the armed attack, Brazil expresses its solidarity with Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Kuwait, and Jordan – targets of retaliatory attacks by Iran on February 28.
>While lamenting the loss of civilian lives, Brazil also expresses its solidarity with the families of the victims. It emphasizes, in this regard, the obligation of States to ensure the protection of civilians, in accordance with International Humanitarian Law.
>Brazil reaffirms that dialogue and diplomatic negotiation constitute the only viable path to overcoming differences and building a lasting solution, with the United Nations playing a central role in the prevention and resolution of conflicts, in accordance with the Charter of San Francisco.
You would think Ukraine would be against war by an aggressor…
Based Norway
EDIT: LOL downvoted by pedophiles
The Palestinian authority condemned Iran
In case anyone was confused
The map clearly shows Iran is against the US/Israeli strikes on Iran.
Common Norwegian W
Is it only Government position?
These categories are pretty dodgy.
Norway is against the strikes (red), and have stated that’s due to international law and escalation (blue), and it is also against the Iranian retaliations (purple).
International law is super important when you have massacred tens of thousands of unarmed demonstrators. Fuck around and find around. Justice served for oppressed women
Wow Im surprised that US and Israel is in favor with US and Israel strikes on Iran. I would thought they would be against it.
Very instructive.
Canada showing they have no real convictions. I think when Carney said „The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must“ he silently implied, „And the brown people, who cares what happens to them, they aren’t real people anyway…“
I would have assumed China would be red
I can see why Ukraine is the only European nation for this but not sure why they’re the only one really.
The Gulf cucks are bouta get it too
Australia?
That seems unlikely.
But what does New Zealand think??
Correction: Japan agrees and fully support the attack
[https://www.mod.go.jp/j/press/kisha/2026/0301a_r.html](https://www.mod.go.jp/j/press/kisha/2026/0301a_r.html)
„Reporter:
Does that mean you are expressing support for the U.S. attack?
Minister:
As both the Chief Cabinet Secretary and the Minister for Foreign Affairs have stated, I believe that is the position of the government as a whole.“
Orban: Prepare for terrorist threats in Hungary!!!! (You need to fear for your life, I have 42 days left please just FEAR)
why africa always grey wtf
Lots of us in the US are very much against this fiasco! And we’re tired of Netanyahu too! Ship him and Trump off to Mars!
Germany, France and the UK mainly condemned the Iranian retaliation.
Basically telling them to stop fighting back. They aren’t in favour of upholding international law, otherwise you’d sanction the US and Israel for violating it again and again.
Interesting that Iran was red.
This map is wrong about Uruguay. The government expresed its [extreme concern](https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-relaciones-exteriores/comunicacion/comunicados/uruguay-expresa-preocupacion-ataques-militares-1) about USA – Israel’s strikes on Iran.