Indiens Hochkommissar weist die „absurden“ Anschuldigungen zurück und begrüßt eine Neuausrichtung der Beziehungen zu Kanada
https://www.thestar.com/politics/federal/dismissing-preposterous-allegations-indias-high-commissioner-welcomes-reset-in-relations-with-canada/article_0e8eb964-5eff-4899-bd4f-1ba0c0bea0ab.html
4 Kommentare
lol this commissioner is such a dirty snake, I remember him on power and politics acting all smug.
Now he’s saying
[The Indian High Commissioner to Canada is pleased that a senior Canadian official said that the Indian government is no longer involved in violence in Canada “It’s not a question of it is no longer happening, it never happened & I’m glad that people are realizing that”](https://x.com/gray_mackenzie/status/2027663796278595929?s=46&t=xSYLnqsRVgAIYtAQOgKFIA)
Seems like Carney gov has totally removed CSIS from the table for this smug guy
This is so slimy of Carney. Sure, ya we need new trading partners, but does elbows up really mean anything, if its knees down to another country that has disrespected our sovereignty?
For some users saying that India was justified in taking action because we’re harbouring terrorists, there are very good reasons we don’t deport accused terrorists to India.
The Indian justice system is an absolute joke. Torture is widespread, evidence is often fabricated by corrupt cops, they have decades long case backlogs, and they hold people in detention for years without trial on sham charges. The Indian government also murdered thousands of Punjabi civilians in the 1980’s, they even suspended the constitutional protections against murder and organized Punjab’s police into death squads.
It’s not that Canada won’t deport these people, it’s that our government legally can’t. Any Canadian judge looking at these conditions would laugh any crown attorney out of the court room if they tried to deport an accused terrorist to India. In Canada the government isn’t allowed to deport Indian political dissidents, especially if they’re Canadian citizens, just because the Indian government tortured someone until they said the guy was a terrorist.
Calling the claims “preposterous” doesn’t answer them. RCMP says they have evidence linking Indian agents to violence and intimidation, and they’re not inclined to dump classified intel on social media for public viewing. You can challenge that evidence, but saying it doesn’t exist isn’t the same as disproving it. A trade reset doesn’t solve security concerns. Time passing doesn’t mean nothing happened.
Canada allows peaceful Sikh separatist speech because our laws protect political expression. Calling that support for extremism is ridiculous. In the US, an India-linked murder plot led to charges and a guilty plea. That makes such blanket denial harder to take seriously. If the claims are wrong, show why. Words alone aren’t enough.