Starmer verspricht, nach Labours lähmender Nachwahlniederlage „weiterzukämpfen“.
https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/starmer-fight-on-wake-labour-by-election-defeat-5HjdTcL_2/
Von hihepo1
Starmer verspricht, nach Labours lähmender Nachwahlniederlage „weiterzukämpfen“.
https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/starmer-fight-on-wake-labour-by-election-defeat-5HjdTcL_2/
Von hihepo1
30 Kommentare
Blue Labour are sleepwalking us into a Reform government in a few years.
If not doing great in a by-election were a resigning matter, no British Prime Minister would ever serve a full term.
The media seems to be obsessed with the idea of replacing Starmer. I know the Tories made a habit of regicide recently but it’s not actually normal practice in this country. Generally, and rightly, it’s the voters who get to choose who is Prime Minister when they vote at a General Election.
> crippling defeat
It’s one seat. I’m pretty sure their majority in parliament is still safe.
I think the best thing that may come from this by-election (apart from Reform losing), is that hopefully it will finally make Labour realise that lurching to the right is an incredibly shit idea and that most sensible people will turn their backs unless the ship is righted (of ‘lefted’ as it were).
It’s not in the article but this was a quote from the [full interview](
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2026/feb/27/gorton-and-denton-byelection-result-labour-green-party-reform-uk-politics-latest-news?CMP=share_btn_url&page=with%3Ablock-69a17b528f0807e27ff0a801#block-69a17b528f0807e27ff0a801):
> I will also fight against the extremes in politics on the right and the left, parties who want to tear our country apart.
I was hoping Starmer might wake up after this result and realise McSweeney has led him down a path to failure. That quote makes it sounds like Starmer is just going to change his message from „I’m not Reform, so vote for me“ to „I’m not Reform or the Greens, so vote for me“.
>This result must be a wake up call. It’s time to really listen – and to reflect.
>Voters want the change that we promised – and they voted for.
>If we want to unrig the system, if we want to make the change we were sent into Government to make, we have to be braver.
>A labour agenda that puts people first.
>That’s what all of us across our movement need to rededicate ourselves to this morning
– Angela Rayner / X
As I immediately assumed seeing the result, left-wing voices in Labour have a voice and now a good reason to use it.
It’s amazing what happens when a party doesn’t give you dinosaurs to vote for…
Seriously though, if Labour want to survive in some way they need to change to proportional representation.
End of the day he sacrificed this seat to save his own skin.
No one can say for definite that Burnham would have won but we can say with great confidence that he would have done a lot better than the handpicked candidate.
Starmer put himself above the party yet again.
Maybe Labour first when they got in going after the disabled citizens and trying to be a Tory/Reform 2.0 will never work as our media class on 6 figures only want either Tory/Reform to win for the tax cuts…..
Starmer said about “dark days ahead”.
In one of his first speeches….
He has zero political instincts from a PR perspective.
So Starmer should’ve and could’ve stopped pandering to the right wing 24/7.
Farage has made a miscalculation bringing in the 2010 – 2024 Tory MPS who have ruined economically Britain.
Online now they are targeting who and how people have voted, Reform and seems Labour also joining in.
We have a centre right party in Labour far right in Tory, far far right in Reform and far far far right in Restore……
No wonder Greens have momentum.
I like what Labour’s doing, to be honest. As unfashionable as it is to say.
If that swing is even half mirrored in his own constituency he won’t have a seat in 2029.
Starmer is an idiot
Burnham was a threat, but now by coming third he’s completely ceded narrative of ‚only we can stop Reform‘ to the Greens
His inner city seats will be cannibalised to the Greens. The hinterlands to Reform. Scotland and Wales to SNP/Plaid. They can all smell weakness. It actually weakens the chance of an anti-Reform coalition, doesn’t strengthen it
Now he’s going to do loads of pivoting to the soft left to get them back onside, but my experience is from Scotland is that when those voters go they are gone for good. Why would they have skimmed progressive policies when Polanski will offer them the full fat real thing?
Starmer learning absolutely nothing from the bloody nose Labour have just had. I’m no fan of populist politics but a formerly safe Labour seat just got utterly trounced with Labour pushed into third place. You aren’t going to win people over by saying they’re deluded in voting for extremism. Something is resonating with them to vote for Reform or Green and you best understand it and put a leader in charge who doesn’t look like a walking bureaucratic bit of cardboard with the charisma of a service station paper towel.
Can’t Starmer and his advisors ‘read the room’? Hear the message voters, especially once loyal and reliably Labour voters are sending them??
Is Starmer and his advisors that determined to put his own interests remaining as Prime Minister before and ahead of the interests of the Labour Party, and more importantly the country as a whole??
At least it wasn’t a farage party winning. As a Canadian, he’s the poilievre of your country. Same rhetoric as him.
At least it may trigger strategic voting to keep Green out.
I totally understand protest votes but there are limits.
He blocked Burnham who would have probably won him the seat but lost him the PM office.
When people voted Labour they wanted Labour – not Tory lite.
He’s hated by those who didn’t vote for him and by trying to appease them all the time – he’s losing support from those who did vote for him.
The politics is so amateur by Labour atm. Reform have 8 seats in Parliament – why are you letting them define the dialogue around politics in the UK? All we ever hear about is immigration – nobody has any idea of what the govt has done positive in the last 2 years.
He should at least recognise the Labour Government people wanted is at odds with the Labour Government we’ve ended up with
Labour, and the prime minister, have failed normal labour voters. It’s no surprise people want change. A vote for reform was never a change as they are still propped up by the same companies that run the others. Everyday people don’t matter with them so I really hope this is the start of a wider change.
„Japanese soldier who fought for 30 years after the war ended“ ass PM.
Threw away an easy win because they were worried about Andy Burnham challenging Starmer’s leadership then ran a dishonest campaign where they pretended that the Greens weren’t in the running and even sent out dishonest „tactical choice“ leaflets recommending voting Labour to keep Reform out.
Got third place.
Honestly the party is in such a shameful state and I’m going to cheer every loss they earn.
Who would replace him? Most, if not all, of the Labour Right are utterly despised by the public.
Its wild that Labours strategy in 2026 is still „lets be Tory lite and assume the left will vote for us because we’re not actually tories or the new teal coloured tories“
What an incredibly enthusing pitch for progressive people to vote for. How inspiring. /s
And then they still do the shocked pikachu face and tell us that we’re splitting the vote when progressive people vote for parties that actually call out the fact that, you know, its kinda sick that we live in a society with both billionaires and people who are in full time work who clock out from a days graft, go to a food bank and then back to their black mold infested rental flat.
„The Labour party is the only party that can unite our country and our communities, and we will line up together in that fight against the extremes of the left and the right.“ The man is fucking deluded.
Not sure this is the PM’s problem… ostensibly, this is what he wanted.
The seat was a safe Labour seat for over 100 years. The bloke who resigned wished death upon one of his constituents, and had to go. Clearing the way for Burnham to run. But Starmer veto’d that because he didn’t want a leadership competition.
Seems to me, Burnham would’ve won the seat if he’d run. He’s very popular. But clearly that wasn’t a priority for Starmer, so he’s just taking the loss. And the residents of the constiutency are punishing Labour not just for rejecting Burnham, but also for the previous blokes faux pas by voting for Greens and Reform. Labour royally fucked this seat, and guaranteed themselves that Labour wouldn’t win it…
This was clearly going to happen… This loss was 100% a choice. They could’ve rescued it from the faux pas. The seat would’ve stayed safe with Burnham, but Starmer said no.
Obviously the only solution is to go after the left of the party, again. That’ll definitely fix the issue that the left despite taking 30 years to realise it has realised New Labour is not their party.
They really do just want to throw the next election don’t they?
And by „fighting on“, he means he’ll continue to beat down on the left and do his best to hand the keys over to UKIP, The Brexit Party, Reform at the next election.
Starmer in a hot dog costume „We’re all trying to find the guy who made us unpopular“
Japanese Soldier Who Kept Fighting 29 Years After WW2