
Demokraten fragen Pam Bondi, ob gegen Trump im Zusammenhang mit Epstein aktiv ermittelt wird
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/epstein-files-trump-accuser-pam-bondi_n_699f9e60e4b01b76c0e3a69d?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=reddit&utm_campaign=us_main

Demokraten fragen Pam Bondi, ob gegen Trump im Zusammenhang mit Epstein aktiv ermittelt wird
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/epstein-files-trump-accuser-pam-bondi_n_699f9e60e4b01b76c0e3a69d?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=reddit&utm_campaign=us_main
20 Kommentare
tumbleweed rolling in the wind.
I’m sure she’ll give a straight answer. And in totally unrelated news…
In 2013, then-Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi received a **$25,000 donation** from the Donald J. Trump Foundation for her re-election efforts. The contribution sparked significant controversy and legal scrutiny due to its timing and the source of the funds.
Key Facts of the Controversy
* **The Timing:** The donation was received just days after Bondi’s office confirmed it was reviewing a fraud lawsuit brought by New York’s Attorney General against **Trump University**. Shortly after, Bondi’s office declined to join the lawsuit or pursue its own investigation, citing a lack of sufficient grounds.
* **Illegal Source:** Because the donation came from a **501(c)(3) charitable foundation**, it violated federal tax laws prohibiting charities from participating in political campaigns.
* **IRS Fine:** In 2016, Donald Trump paid a **$2,500 penalty** to the IRS for the improper contribution and was required to personally reimburse the foundation for the $25,000.
To which AG Bondi paused, then in a measured tone said:
And you congressman, you fake fraud lawyer, didn’t you have a brother in law who ran an illegal puppy farm…
We know that will never happen with this AG
What? Of course not they are openly protecting him
[removed]
But the DOW is over 50,000! (it’s not right now)
The Dow is doing fine /s
The purpose is to put them in a corner. If the answer is yes, then exactly what is he being investigated for? If no, then the law states the docs involving him must be made available unredacted.
I’m sure I’m not alone in the need to know for certain whether this president ever forced a 13 year old girl to suck on his mushroom, and then walloped her in the head when she tried to spit him out. It’s just too gross an accusation to ignore, based on the quality of „his word“ and his filthy history.
They know the answer
Clever because making it an ‘active investigation’ would help their case in hiding the relevant files and untold info – but they would certainly have liked to keep that secret. Let’s see what they say lol
Geez, who can believe this man is innocent?
Good; ask her when the DOW is under 50 thou.
„Have you offered thanks to him?! I think you should be thanking him STOCK MARKET AT 50K!“
But THE DOW!!!
Yah. He only has immunity for his crimes if they are committed in office.
Bro have you even seen the Dow
Oh come on. That’s like asking if water is as wet as JD’s wife.
That’s all well and good but look at the Dow