Hillary Clintons Aussage unter Ausschluss der Öffentlichkeit scheiterte, nachdem Boebert ein Foto an einen rechten Kommentator weitergegeben hatte
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/hillary-clinton-deposition-epstein-pause-photo-leak-b2928370.html
39 Kommentare
Boebert breaks rules. Shocker.
>After the post, Clinton adviser Nick Merrill said that the hearing went off the record “while they figure out where the photo came from and why possibly members of Congress are violating House rules.”
We all know Boebert will face no consequences for violating House rules. Think what you will of Hillary Clinton but she isn’t a shrinking violet and has testified ad nauseum over her lifetime. They can’t flap her so they say she doesn’t look happy.
So they derailed the interview they’ve wanted for a decade intentionally? Lol ruh roh
And this is why the hearing should be public
In a normal world, I’d have expected for Boebert to be kicked out.
But then who is gonna give the Republicans sitting next to her handies?
Same ol‘ Bobo: still a jerkoff.
This trash article contains this as the last line
> Trump is mentioned in the Epstein files because he was once friends with Jeffrey Epstein. However, the two stopped being friends long before Epstein was investigated and convicted in Florida of prostitution.
I am unable to register to create a comment under it. But the article is trash, mainly given this last line being stated as a fact, when in fact, the Epstein Files have not been fully released, have been heavily redacted in unjustified ways, and the public is demanding to know all the ways Trump was mentioned, abd what investigation was done into the tips where he is clearly mentioned as being involved. The Independent failed to mention that the DOJ was caught withholding and lying about the Epstein Files, and is currently being considered not a reliable source… at the very least they should mention that they are quoting the DOJ’s line instead of publishing as fact.
A trash article that shields the rich and powerful; a tool for impunity and shamelessness. I’ll remember that The Independent published this.
If they’re going to question this wife of a president, then we can all think of another wife of a president who should also be questioned.
I will bet that Donny knows to whom I am referring, which is why he is not happy about the Clintons being there.
Well at least she wasn’t vaping and giving out handjobs. Baby steps.
Boebert will just give out handjobs and this will all be forgotten about.
How much did she get paid?
Trash article
Senate penalties for this kind of thing go up to expulsion, not sure about the House.
There is a shamefully false statement in this article by *The Independent* which states, without qualification, that…
>Trump is not accused of any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein.
*The Independent* clearly knows that that is simply NOT TRUE…. there are in fact direct, clear accusations in released Trump-Epstein files, with further detail in some [still concealed files, that Trump forced a 13 year old girl to take his mushroom knob into her mouth, then swatted her head when she defended herself](https://www.npr.org/2026/02/24/nx-s1-5723968/epstein-files-trump-accusation-maxwell) by biting his disgusting member.
I’d like *The Independent* to publicly and loudly correct this disinformation (i.e., claiming Trump is not accused) as an instance of gross editorial error, else rename itself as *Trump Talking Points*.
I can’t believe Benny Johnson, a guy who was fired from Buzzfeed for plagiarizing 60+ articles from other real journalists, would conspire with a congresswomen caught on video giving public handjobs to do such an unethical thing. 😱
Banana republic.
They wanted it behind closed doors. So who took the photo with their mobile/ cell phone? So I take it the orange one will be called next?!
Let me guess – she won’t face any consequences whatsoever.
They didn’t “stop being friends”
The same Benny that was fired from Buzzfeed for plagiarism and found to be bank rolled by Russia …. That influencer?
You misspelled Paid Russian Commentator
I just saw Boerbert on Bill Maher last week and she was kinda almost very civil and well behaved. I’m not shocked, but to pull this shit now, what a bullshit act she put on for that show…
“Trump is mentioned in the Epstein files because he was once friends with Jeffrey Epstein. However, the two stopped being friends long before Epstein was investigated and convicted in Florida of prostitution.”
Are you sure about that?
You sure about that!?
What kills me is that Johnson used it for a twitter post in which he said she “does not look happy.” This was a deposition about Epstein. Can you imagine the shitstorm if she did look happy? What facile bs.
She leaked it to a guy who was caught taking Russian bribes.
It was planned. The Republicans knew that this was going to backfire. She was told to do this so it would derail it.
Must not have been enough drama in the deposition. So she had to make some
At this point, why should Hillary ask for nothing but an open deposition? It’s obvious the GOP can’t control themselves in any situation as seen here by Hoebert. Just reject the subpoenas until not closed door. It’s not like they can arrest her since the GOP dodges those too
Of course it was boobert.
Given the opportunity, I believe Boebert would have jumped at the chance to be one of Epstein’s girls.
Trump raped children
Boebert should be charged.
Ah yes, the administration of transparency which refused the allow the hearing to be public.
We *need* to understand what happened with Epstein in order to move forward as a country and yet the administration continues to spit in the face of that. They are robbing us blind.
We can’t allow a public hearing like they requested but we’ll allow leaking goofy pics to nut jobs as some kind of “gotcha”. Comer and Jordan are, again, absolute clowns.
Boebert who jerked off her boyfriend in a public setting with children in the theater, who’s son impregnated a minor and keeps getting arrested, and who published her opponents location during J6? She leaked photos against the law? No way, I’m shocked.
Ok ok ok, but what was in the last minute secret photo of Clinton? Is it all just republican shenanigans?
depends on what the definition of ‚is‘ is
How proud Colorado must be.
Going to be honest, my very first thought was Boebert didn’t take the picture and send to Benny, it’s a setup. Obviously that’s an ignorant thought, as I hadn’t even read the article at that moment.
First question though… Why wasn’t her comment sought out for the story in an attempt to collaborate Benny’s claim, or did I miss it?