This is a clear example of why AI-generated content summaries need more robust review mechanisms before reaching users. Google’s AI likely surfaced the term from the article it was summarizing, but without proper content filtering, it generated a harmful output. The bigger concern is the speed at which AI news alerts propagate – by the time a correction is issued, the damage is done. Responsible AI deployment in high-visibility features like news summaries requires multilayer safety checks, not just post-incident apologies.
properfoxes on
Like something in Better Off Ted it’s so ridiculous
UnexpectedAnanas on
Black Mirror couldn’t write this shit.
justbunnies on
I saw the screen shot and I’m shocked how blatant it is. This is what happens when you use the internet and social media to teach your AI.
jpiro on
First case of an AI agent suffering from Tourette’s Syndrome. They really are becoming more like us every day.
/s
luxmesa on
I guess they outsourced it to Grok
Night-Monkey15 on
I thought it’d be at least in a quote or something. Nope. This is just blatant racism
this_my_sportsreddit on
Tarantino racing to turn this into a short film
into_wishin_666 on
People keep citing what needs to be done to A.I., except for the one true solution, scrapping it.
Dreddddddd on
Google, I don’t care how many passes you trained your model on, you don’t have the pass.
Elliot-S9 on
Generative AI is so useless. Can we please just admit this and go back to 2016?
CharacterCompany7224 on
Okay any consequences or just another apology also written by AI?
PinHaunting7192 on
„Proudly powered by Grok!“
Probably.
knightcrusader on
They since added this „clarification“:
> The original version of this story stated that the Google news alert was AI-generated. Google has since made clear that, although the inclusion of the N-word was a tech error, it was not AI-generated. Google said its systems “recognised a euphemism for an offensive term on several web pages, and accidentally applied the offensive term to the notification text.” It added: “This system error did not involve AI. Our safety filters did not properly trigger, which is what caused this.“
Um, so the system did it on its own without human oversight? Picking words based on its usage in other places? Hmm, sounds like something an LLM would do…
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
14 Kommentare
This is a clear example of why AI-generated content summaries need more robust review mechanisms before reaching users. Google’s AI likely surfaced the term from the article it was summarizing, but without proper content filtering, it generated a harmful output. The bigger concern is the speed at which AI news alerts propagate – by the time a correction is issued, the damage is done. Responsible AI deployment in high-visibility features like news summaries requires multilayer safety checks, not just post-incident apologies.
Like something in Better Off Ted it’s so ridiculous
Black Mirror couldn’t write this shit.
I saw the screen shot and I’m shocked how blatant it is. This is what happens when you use the internet and social media to teach your AI.
First case of an AI agent suffering from Tourette’s Syndrome. They really are becoming more like us every day.
/s
I guess they outsourced it to Grok
I thought it’d be at least in a quote or something. Nope. This is just blatant racism
Tarantino racing to turn this into a short film
People keep citing what needs to be done to A.I., except for the one true solution, scrapping it.
Google, I don’t care how many passes you trained your model on, you don’t have the pass.
Generative AI is so useless. Can we please just admit this and go back to 2016?
Okay any consequences or just another apology also written by AI?
„Proudly powered by Grok!“
Probably.
They since added this „clarification“:
> The original version of this story stated that the Google news alert was AI-generated. Google has since made clear that, although the inclusion of the N-word was a tech error, it was not AI-generated. Google said its systems “recognised a euphemism for an offensive term on several web pages, and accidentally applied the offensive term to the notification text.” It added: “This system error did not involve AI. Our safety filters did not properly trigger, which is what caused this.“
Um, so the system did it on its own without human oversight? Picking words based on its usage in other places? Hmm, sounds like something an LLM would do…