Share.

13 Kommentare

  1. Independent-Reader on

    If they didn’t they might have to worry about a bunch of bastards coming out of the woodwork trying to claim their inheritance.

    I’ve seen enough game of thrones to know how this shit works.

  2. Great, makes no difference to a damned thing in the real world, not exactly a worthy consequence for his vile nonceness… 

  3. Clear_Anything1232 on

    Why can’t they prosecute him like common sex offenders are prosecuted.

    There is enough evidence right?

  4. It’s a moot point anyway. A bunch of people substantially younger than him would all have to die first before he took the throne.

    Still, he should be taken out of the line of succession.

  5. George I was 57th in line to the British throne. You never know what’s going to happen. If parliament decides that Andrew would be an unsuitable monarch, they should remove him from the line of succession now.

  6. Keen to remove him I get, how keen are you on removing any Israeli influencers from your own parliament?

  7. Peter_Griffin2001 on

    Can we please just get on with it and become a republic already. Just make the Governor-General the official head of state, which they are in every practical sense, and we can be done with all the royal nonsense forever. We tell ourselves that our national values are a fair go, egalitarianism, and equality of opportunity, and yet our head of state is a foreign monarch because one family was chosen by God to sit on a golden throne and reign over us forever. It has no place in a 21st century democracy.

    These royal people are less than useless.

  8. bestestopinion on

    It has no practical effect, but it would still be a nice rebuke and humiliation

  9. CulturedReaving692 on

    Isn’t this just a huge waste of time since he has no chance anyways?

Leave A Reply