Close Menu
    Technik

    Microsoft verwendet ein plagiiertes AI-Slop-Flussdiagramm, um zu erklären, wie Github funktioniert, und entfernt es, nachdem der ursprüngliche Erfinder Vincent Driessen darauf hingewiesen hat: „Die KI-Abzocke war nicht nur hässlich. Sie war nachlässig, offensichtlich amateurhaft und, um es vorsichtig auszudrücken, ohne jeden Ehrgeiz. Microsoft unwürdig.“


    Microsoft verwendet ein plagiiertes AI-Slop-Flussdiagramm, um zu erklären, wie Github funktioniert, und entfernt es, nachdem der ursprüngliche Erfinder Vincent Driessen darauf hingewiesen hat: „Die KI-Abzocke war nicht nur hässlich. Sie war nachlässig, offensichtlich amateurhaft und, um es vorsichtig auszudrücken, ohne jeden Ehrgeiz. Microsoft unwürdig.“

    https://www.pcgamer.com/software/ai/microsoft-uses-plagiarized-ai-slop-flowchart-to-explain-how-github-works-removes-it-after-original-creator-calls-it-out-careless-blatantly-amateuristic-and-lacking-any-ambition-to-put-it-gently/

    Share.
    View 10 Comments

    10 Kommentare

    2. mx3goose on

      You won’t convince me these arnt just agents they are running publishing things with wranglers. The idea is they post, people get upset the team notes the failure and incorporates it into the model and we keep going until its being released with less and less push back until one day, nobody even notices. Everybody here just parrots „hur hur microslop strikes again“ but really its planned failure to for gathering alignment data.

    4. muscleLAMP on

      “Careless, blatantly amateuristic, and lacking any ambition”

      Fitting description for all of AI.

    5. azthal on

      Heres the thing I just dont understand with people who use AI like this. How can you be so lazy?

      I work in tech. I use AI to create slides. It can do it faster than I can, and the result looks better.

      BUT I CHECK AND FIX THE DAMNED THINGS BEFORE SHOWING IT TO SOMEONE

      Like, I dont get it. Did they not even for a second look at the stuff generated to go „well, this is shit“?
      Or have Microsoft gone so far down the agentic route that they have AI Agents autonomously updating pages with no oversight?

      I literally demonstrated AI functionality using the solution we sell just yesterday, and the flow is always „AI Does thing -> Human validates. AI Does second thing -> Human validates“.

      I am not on the reddit bandwagon of „AI bad and cant do anything useful“. When used appropriately AI can be extremely useful, but you have to be a fucking moron if you just use AI to do your work with no oversight.

    7. font9a on

      I am assuming the arrow of time was carefully considered and Microsoft decided that’s not how git actually works.

    8. Rendogog on

      The funny thing is you can probably find thousands of diagrams that are near enough identical to Driesson’s for the AI to use as source material and it still f’ed it up.

    9. Kreiri on

      [Microslop page as captured by Wayback Machine](http://web.archive.org/web/20260217004204/https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/training/modules/introduction-to-github/3-components-of-github-flow#git-flow)

      [Driessen’s post with the original diagram](https://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/)

      Slop version not only has misspelled words, not only has missing elements, not only has reversed the „time“ arrow, but also is nearly 15 times heavier for some reason (1.78M vs 121k).

    Leave A Reply