Close Menu
    Daten

    Verstöße des Kongresses gegen die Einreichungsregeln des STOCK Act in den letzten drei Jahren [OC]

    Quelle: insidercat.com Verwendung finanzieller Offenlegungen des Repräsentantenhauses/Senats

    • Geschäfte, die mehr als 45 Tage nach der Ausführung offengelegt werden, werden als Verstöße gegen das STOCK Act gekennzeichnet.
    • Nach Partei: Dems: 592 (3,5 % der Trades) / Reps: 1442 (15,5 % der Trades)
    • Bemerkenswerte Händler: Pelosi 0 %, Khanna 0,1 %, Tuberville 0 %, Bresnahan 0 %.
    • Deckt US-Aktien-/ETF-Transaktionen in den letzten 36 Monaten ab

    Von Due_Patient_2650

    View 8 Comments

    8 Kommentare

    1. Due_Patient_2650 on

      The STOCK Act requires members of Congress to disclose trades within 45 days or risk a $200 fine. See 2nd & 3rd images for details.

      The data covers US stock/ETF transactions extracted from House/Senate financial disclosures in the last 3 years. Transactions whose reporting delay exceeds the 45-day window are flagged. There may be errors in the data as some disclosures are filed by hand. 

      We estimate the total volume of transactions by using the midpoint between the disclosed dollar value ranges. We estimate returns using FIFO method to estimate changes in positions over time, and then using TWR (time-weighted returns) formula to account for cash flows. These two methods are also commonly used by portfolio trackers.

      Note: If you are, or if you work for a member of Congress, you have a right of reply. Please contact the email listed on the page for review and correction.

      Tools: Python, Next.js
      Data source: House/Senate financial disclosures

    3. the_mellojoe on

      $200 fine? That’s it? Christmas, that’s not even a slap on the wrist.

    4. yodog5 on

      This is always what happens when the penalty for a crime is just a fine. This is just the cost of doing business.

      This needs a higher penalty, like idk, prison?

    5. hikeonpast on

      The X-axis label doesn’t describe what the percentages imply on each bar, just the total number of offenses. (I know what they are, but the graph is otherwise very well done, so just offering a nitpick).

    6. badlyagingmillenial on

      So the data is saying that Republicans violate the rules significantly more often, but Democrats make better trades when they choose to do it?

    7. Khyron_2500 on

      All the homies hate Lisa McClain, but it doesn’t matter because she’s basically unopposed in a district that is like +20 for Republicans

    8. AlwaysHopelesslyLost on

      I have a feeling any republicans seeing this would immediately react by saying „see, democrats too“ or „this is fake data.“

      Personally, as a democrat, my reaction is „lets investigate and potentially remove those democrats!“

    Leave A Reply