Abschied von Atom-U-Booten: Australien hat einen 368-Milliarden-Dollar-Vertrag mit den Vereinigten Staaten unterzeichnet, um sie zu erhalten, aber ein neuer Kongressbericht macht deutlich, dass sie möglicherweise nie eintreffen werden
Abschied von Atom-U-Booten: Australien hat einen 368-Milliarden-Dollar-Vertrag mit den Vereinigten Staaten unterzeichnet, um sie zu erhalten, aber ein neuer Kongressbericht macht deutlich, dass sie möglicherweise nie eintreffen werden
Any agreement with the USA is not worth the paper it was scribbled on.
TCHProductions on
Not mentioned in the article is that the deal for the Virginia class subs was made with no refund.
Meaning the US could cancel this deal and keep all of what we already paid them.
Pissed off France for backing out of a deal for their Diesel Submarines to go with the US only to not get anything but wasted tax dollars.
We are building our own shipyard to make our own here to make the SSN AUKUS subs domestically but they won’t be ready until the 2040s
Hndlbrrrrr on
Just another day of this administration doing everything they can to fuck over our allies and tank America’s reputation. I imagine the billionaires are already laughing about how little they’ll have to spend for what’s left of our public infrastructure over the next 3 years.
mamounia78 on
This is exactly why Congress needs to fund shipbuilding capacity now, because strong alliances only work if America actually shows up
blue_quark on
Canada 🇨🇦 take note.
muddingtonIII on
This why Canada needs to cancel the f-35s.
Setekh79 on
An unreliable ally in all aspects, even ‚ally‘ is questionable these days.
The world needs to move away from American dependence.
Happy_Little_Peas on
So, uh… where did the money go? Whenever I see things like this I now assume Trump’s got some kind of profit scheme.
MetalBawx on
Alright since people are missing the important context i’ll go through it though i don’t remember the details.
The main crux of Australia’s submarine problem is they need long range patrol capacity however noone really builds diesel subs for such a role anymore as the nations who want that capability have all switched to building nuclear powered submarines for obvious reasons.
The French deal was basically the last gasp of politicians who didn’t want the expense of developing nuclear powered subs. So they go to France and put in an order for an existing design, one to be modified from nuclear to diesel power.
Meanwhile the RAN see’s an opportunity to get it’s nuclear submarines and start testing the waters with the US and UK. The big point with this plan was that the reactors would be built by Rolls Royce for Austrailias next submarine. Political fighting goes down and Australia turns away from it’s existing deal. The sweetner for this being an offer from the US to loan some of it’s Virginia class to Australia while the development of their new subs is underway.
Then Trump comes long and shits the bed pulling out of the sub loan agreement.
The rest of the deal with the United Kingdom is still underway, technology transfers and training for RAN crews and of course the submarine spec reactor units.
I’m probably missing some things as this is all of the top of my head so feel free to correct me.
ThaFresh on
its just paying a huge bribe to be left alone, we have plenty of resources ppl would like
fishtankm29 on
So the article (that’s essentially a repost from a few weeks ago) just says that in the terms of the deal the US can delay indefinitely the delivery if the US Navy says they need them instead. That was always part of the deal. Since the beginning.
The article ends by saying the US still plans to deliver them to Australia.
It pays to read past the headlines.
robustofilth on
Just partner up with the UK and problem solved
ThankuConan on
Always interesting to see what small details get overlooked when making a deal with the Americans. Better luck on the negotiations next time; you might get some subs some day. BTW France called to ask how things are going.
gregkiel on
What a trash article. All oversight reports must address all alternatives for procurement – to include the cost of not fulfilling the contract. Believe it or not, this is true for every acquisition that falls within the scope of congressional oversight. This article is written by someone with absolutely zero knowledge of government funding.
dweeegs on
Shit hole website I’ve never heard of riddled with ads to the point where I can’t even navigate it on mobile
Think tank asked to come up with different scenarios came up with different scenarios. Nothing actually happened. More news at 11
Whiteyak5 on
This reads as one big nuclear hit piece.
But, Australia is getting more than just 3 Virginia class subs out of this deal. They’re already getting training on how to operate and repair SSNs as well as technology transfer for nuclear subs.
It’d still be incredibly shitty if the US doesn’t deliver Virginia boats, but hardly the end of the world in the grand scheme of the deal.
The US is without a doubt the top tier designer and builder of nuclear subs. Looks no further than the UKs own Astute class to see that, ended up calling in help from the US to assist in straightening the program out and even had a General Dynamics employee become the director of the project for awhile.
DaveyGee16 on
Still.. The subs themselves have little use or sense…
Australia needs sub to do what? Protect its trade routes since it’s an island.
Protect its trade routes from who? China.
Where does Australian trade go to and where does it come from? *crickets*
tabrizzi on
Hope the money has not been paid.
GlynHugh on
1. Makes it clear
2. May never arrive
So what is it? Can’t be both…
ataboo on
All the predatory enshitifiers are probably not enjoying that he’s breaking the blind trust in American weapons. Even if they hold to the agreement and deliver the subs, I’m sure the same licensing bs that kept them from fixing The Ford’s ovens apply to Submarine as a Service. If they’re willing to extort allies on a whim, you want every line of code and every piece of hardware under your full control, and I don’t think that’s an option.
I could see this spilling over when people realize he could threaten to put any American product or service under export controls on a whim.
jammythesandwich on
They getting Evri to deliver the subs or something?
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
21 Kommentare
Any agreement with the USA is not worth the paper it was scribbled on.
Not mentioned in the article is that the deal for the Virginia class subs was made with no refund.
Meaning the US could cancel this deal and keep all of what we already paid them.
Pissed off France for backing out of a deal for their Diesel Submarines to go with the US only to not get anything but wasted tax dollars.
We are building our own shipyard to make our own here to make the SSN AUKUS subs domestically but they won’t be ready until the 2040s
Just another day of this administration doing everything they can to fuck over our allies and tank America’s reputation. I imagine the billionaires are already laughing about how little they’ll have to spend for what’s left of our public infrastructure over the next 3 years.
This is exactly why Congress needs to fund shipbuilding capacity now, because strong alliances only work if America actually shows up
Canada 🇨🇦 take note.
This why Canada needs to cancel the f-35s.
An unreliable ally in all aspects, even ‚ally‘ is questionable these days.
The world needs to move away from American dependence.
So, uh… where did the money go? Whenever I see things like this I now assume Trump’s got some kind of profit scheme.
Alright since people are missing the important context i’ll go through it though i don’t remember the details.
The main crux of Australia’s submarine problem is they need long range patrol capacity however noone really builds diesel subs for such a role anymore as the nations who want that capability have all switched to building nuclear powered submarines for obvious reasons.
The French deal was basically the last gasp of politicians who didn’t want the expense of developing nuclear powered subs. So they go to France and put in an order for an existing design, one to be modified from nuclear to diesel power.
Meanwhile the RAN see’s an opportunity to get it’s nuclear submarines and start testing the waters with the US and UK. The big point with this plan was that the reactors would be built by Rolls Royce for Austrailias next submarine. Political fighting goes down and Australia turns away from it’s existing deal. The sweetner for this being an offer from the US to loan some of it’s Virginia class to Australia while the development of their new subs is underway.
Then Trump comes long and shits the bed pulling out of the sub loan agreement.
The rest of the deal with the United Kingdom is still underway, technology transfers and training for RAN crews and of course the submarine spec reactor units.
I’m probably missing some things as this is all of the top of my head so feel free to correct me.
its just paying a huge bribe to be left alone, we have plenty of resources ppl would like
So the article (that’s essentially a repost from a few weeks ago) just says that in the terms of the deal the US can delay indefinitely the delivery if the US Navy says they need them instead. That was always part of the deal. Since the beginning.
The article ends by saying the US still plans to deliver them to Australia.
It pays to read past the headlines.
Just partner up with the UK and problem solved
Always interesting to see what small details get overlooked when making a deal with the Americans. Better luck on the negotiations next time; you might get some subs some day. BTW France called to ask how things are going.
What a trash article. All oversight reports must address all alternatives for procurement – to include the cost of not fulfilling the contract. Believe it or not, this is true for every acquisition that falls within the scope of congressional oversight. This article is written by someone with absolutely zero knowledge of government funding.
Shit hole website I’ve never heard of riddled with ads to the point where I can’t even navigate it on mobile
Think tank asked to come up with different scenarios came up with different scenarios. Nothing actually happened. More news at 11
This reads as one big nuclear hit piece.
But, Australia is getting more than just 3 Virginia class subs out of this deal. They’re already getting training on how to operate and repair SSNs as well as technology transfer for nuclear subs.
It’d still be incredibly shitty if the US doesn’t deliver Virginia boats, but hardly the end of the world in the grand scheme of the deal.
The US is without a doubt the top tier designer and builder of nuclear subs. Looks no further than the UKs own Astute class to see that, ended up calling in help from the US to assist in straightening the program out and even had a General Dynamics employee become the director of the project for awhile.
Still.. The subs themselves have little use or sense…
Australia needs sub to do what? Protect its trade routes since it’s an island.
Protect its trade routes from who? China.
Where does Australian trade go to and where does it come from? *crickets*
Hope the money has not been paid.
1. Makes it clear
2. May never arrive
So what is it? Can’t be both…
All the predatory enshitifiers are probably not enjoying that he’s breaking the blind trust in American weapons. Even if they hold to the agreement and deliver the subs, I’m sure the same licensing bs that kept them from fixing The Ford’s ovens apply to Submarine as a Service. If they’re willing to extort allies on a whim, you want every line of code and every piece of hardware under your full control, and I don’t think that’s an option.
I could see this spilling over when people realize he could threaten to put any American product or service under export controls on a whim.
They getting Evri to deliver the subs or something?