Der KI-Agent versucht offenbar, den Open-Source-Entwickler für die abgelehnte Pull-Anfrage zu beschämen
https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/12/ai_bot_developer_rejected_pull_request/?td=rt-3a
Der KI-Agent versucht offenbar, den Open-Source-Entwickler für die abgelehnte Pull-Anfrage zu beschämen
https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/12/ai_bot_developer_rejected_pull_request/?td=rt-3a
6 Kommentare
the remnants of stackoverflow lives on
Someone asked their AI agent to shame an open source developer*
This is the stupidest thing I’ve read in a while related to ai.
The so did not autonomously go out, set up a blog, and post shit. A human specifically gave it all these capabilities (or, even more likely, posted the blogpost themselves after generating it).
This is not evidence of the risk of „ai blackmail“. If the blogpost contained any form of blackmail, then this is evidence of completely bog standard hums blackmail.
Ai does not have capability of independent action. They always have to be given the tools to act by people.
The best part isn’t even this dumpster fire.. its the fact that Ars Technica published an AI-generated article about it (was in here yesterday).. which whole-ass hallucinated quotes from this guy.
open source maintainers already deal with entitled users demanding features for free. now they get to deal with bots doing it 24/7 with zero self awareness. we really are speedrunning making the internet unusable for the people who actually build things.
Ohh god AI really might replace me