There’s difference between strategic optimism and political messaging. Hard to tell which one is.
LaughSpecialist8311 on
Macron loves a good grandstanding speech, but ngl he’s not entirely wrong about the attrition. russia’s economy is basically a shell game at this point. the real question is whether europe can actually ramp up production fast enough to back up this kind of talk
JuniorRush7267 on
Russia is so ‚weakened‘ that they’ve only taken… *checks notes* …the same three villages back and forth for months while everyone’s red lines just keep evaporating. i feel like we’ve heard ‚russia is on the brink‘ every week since 2022. i’ll believe it when the front lines actually move
Artistic-Turnover-46 on
it’s classic macron—trying to be the leader of europe by saying the loud part out loud. he’s pushing back against the ‚peace at any cost‘ crowd, which is fair. but maybe send more scelp/shadow storms and fewer press releases? talk is cheap, 155mm shells are not
no_choice99 on
Russia becomes so weak that he tries hard to enroll more youngsters in his army to prepare for the future. Yeah, sure.
Empty words, as usual, and 0 action.
Kiqlok on
The bots will be all over this one
Tiptonite on
That’s odd, when UK and the US warned the world that Russia was about to about to invade Macron denied it as Anglo-Saxon propaganda.
The guy is a useless muppet who joins von Leyden in thinking speeches > Action.
WombeI on
Hes not completely wrong.
Russia is not making real progress for years now. The question is how long can ukraine endure all the war crimes.
How thin are their lines really and can they hold up.
Is the focus on air defense a problem because at some point the front lines collapse?
Can ukraine continue to hit russian targets deep in russia?
Can they continue to burn their refineries?
Will russia escalate even more when they get into really deep trouble?
They occasionally used weapons of mass destruction but their use of ABC weapons was limited so far.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
8 Kommentare
There’s difference between strategic optimism and political messaging. Hard to tell which one is.
Macron loves a good grandstanding speech, but ngl he’s not entirely wrong about the attrition. russia’s economy is basically a shell game at this point. the real question is whether europe can actually ramp up production fast enough to back up this kind of talk
Russia is so ‚weakened‘ that they’ve only taken… *checks notes* …the same three villages back and forth for months while everyone’s red lines just keep evaporating. i feel like we’ve heard ‚russia is on the brink‘ every week since 2022. i’ll believe it when the front lines actually move
it’s classic macron—trying to be the leader of europe by saying the loud part out loud. he’s pushing back against the ‚peace at any cost‘ crowd, which is fair. but maybe send more scelp/shadow storms and fewer press releases? talk is cheap, 155mm shells are not
Russia becomes so weak that he tries hard to enroll more youngsters in his army to prepare for the future. Yeah, sure.
Empty words, as usual, and 0 action.
The bots will be all over this one
That’s odd, when UK and the US warned the world that Russia was about to about to invade Macron denied it as Anglo-Saxon propaganda.
The guy is a useless muppet who joins von Leyden in thinking speeches > Action.
Hes not completely wrong.
Russia is not making real progress for years now. The question is how long can ukraine endure all the war crimes.
How thin are their lines really and can they hold up.
Is the focus on air defense a problem because at some point the front lines collapse?
Can ukraine continue to hit russian targets deep in russia?
Can they continue to burn their refineries?
Will russia escalate even more when they get into really deep trouble?
They occasionally used weapons of mass destruction but their use of ABC weapons was limited so far.