Oberster Gerichtshof annulliert Ergebnis der Bundestagswahl in Terrebonne Riding (mit einer Stimme von den Liberalen gewonnen)

https://www.thestar.com/politics/cp-newsalert-supreme-court-annuls-result-from-federal-election-in-terrebonne-riding/article_4361da21-aadb-57e6-a822-467bc86afc75.html

18 Kommentare

  1. koolaidkirby on

    Good, our system is not meant to deal with victory’s with a 1 vote margin of error, this should’ve been a re-run from the start.

  2. stephenBB81 on

    ~~I’m not happy with this, this decision will be used to defend voter apathy.~~

    ~~“Well if he only wins by one vote we’ll need to vote again, why bother voting“~~

    EDIT:

    I realize this likely was going to be a voter apathy argument which ever way it went.

    Either the vote doesn’t matter because winning by 1 it can still get over turned, or the vote doesn’t matter because they might not even count it.

    The vote getting over turned means people are going to vote again, so those dragged out last time to vote, are more likely to be apathetic for the second voting run.

    I should have framed my response better.

  3. Sad_Imagination6012 on

    This has to be the most bitterly contested seat in modern Canadian election history. This young MP is gonna have quite the story to tell her grandkids someday.

    If its any consolation, Carney is expect to call by-elections soon, this seat should be one of them, and considering the spike in approval ratings for the PM and his party post Davos speech, she should solidly win her seat by a wider margin.

  4. So this probably means the Carney isn’t going to achieve majority status via floor crossings any time soon. I imagine this bye election will be a toss up. They need to hold all the seats coming up bye elections from various people leaving parliament. And still need one more defection. A lot of things have to line up.

  5. I’m happy the Supreme Court came out with this decision, it seems like an obvious ruling. 

    I am more surprised that it needed to go to the top court and that lower courts couldn’t figure this out. This should have been an easy call for Elections Canada from the hop.

  6. Called it last year (wish I could find my old comment haha).

    There’s historical precedent that means this way and while Ted Optiz did get the SCC to change their mind, that’s actually the historical exception and not the rule.

  7. dykestryker on

    Some strong liberal cope in the comment section here. Had this been a CPC MP getting dislodge by a Liberal none of this excuse making would be happening.

    > After the April 28 election, a woman in the Terrebonne riding revealed that she had mailed in her vote for the Bloc, but discovered it was never counted after her special ballot was returned due to an error on the envelope’s address

    Elections Canada made mistakes. Probably with no malice intended but nonetheless the supreme court is correct in the descion here. 

  8. Next-Ad-5116 on

    Wow. Surprised it took this long. I feel like everyone knew they made a mistake and this was weird they didn’t cancel it sooner

  9. leftwingmememachine on

    Correct decision, given that mail in voters were disenfranchised by an error on Elections Canada’s part – and that reasonably could have caused a different result!

  10. inthemode01 on

    Summary:

    The Supreme Court of Canada has officially annulled the results of the 2025 federal election in the Montreal-area riding of Terrebonne. Following a judicial recount last spring, Liberal candidate Tatiana Auguste was narrowly declared the winner over Bloc Québécois candidate Nathalie Sinclair-Desgagné by a margin of just a single vote.

    The legal dispute centered on an uncounted mail-in ballot from a Bloc Québécois supporter. The special ballot was returned to the voter and never tallied due to a postal code error on the return envelope provided by Elections Canada. Although a lower court previously ruled the mistake a simple „human error,“ Sinclair-Desgagné’s legal team successfully argued that it constituted a significant electoral irregularity that directly impacted the outcome of the exceptionally close race.

    Shortly after hearing the arguments, the Supreme Court justices invalidated the election results and vacated the Terrebonne seat. This decision officially overturns the previous Superior Court ruling, meaning a by-election will need to be held to determine the riding’s Member of Parliament.

  11. TheDiggityDoink on

    I’m sure Quebec sovereignists are not happy with this decision with the precedence it sets on the prospect of 50%+1

  12. No surprise here, though this seems to have gone under the radar for a lot of people. With Edmonton-Riverbend and now Terrebonne, it’s shaping up to be a lot more interesting than those Toronto byelections.

    I think the Liberals will be hard pressed to hold this seat though, their numbers in Quebec have gotten worse, and suburban trends in the riding haven’t moved quick enough to offset that. But the Liberals have historically done quite well in byelections, excluding the trainwreck that was 2024, so they won’t go down without a fight.

  13. Weary_Position_9591 on

    Question: what does the law or procedure plan for a tied electoral result? Automatically rerun the election of that constituency?

  14. Knight_Machiavelli on

    Absolutely the correct decision. It was blatantly obvious from the start that the lower court ruling was incorrect.

  15. In a case like this, does the MP have to repay the salary and benefits collected since being sworn into government? That would be a horrible situation.

  16. throwitawaytothesea on

    I am curious to read the final opinion. If I remember the original news coverage at the time, the election worker who made the error realized his mistake well before the cutoff date but didn’t alert his supervisors because the number of ballots returned seemed correct to him. For me that goes beyond the type of human error present in any election and makes the issue one of gross incompetence and negligence that irrevocably altered the outcome.

  17. Dave2onreddit on

    So, if the plan is to hold all the by-elections on one day (University—Rosedale, Scarborough Southwest, and now Terrebonne), the earliest date that can happen is now pushed ahead into April.

Leave A Reply