Violent crimes have been committed by those clinically addicted to social media when forced to go cold turkey.
Niceromancer on
Oxy seller says oxy isn’t addictive – turns out it was
Tobacco sellers said tobacco wasn’t addictive, turns out it is.
Alcohol manufacturers…oddly never really denied it was addictive just that they shouldn’t be held responsible for combatting the addiction.
Few_Initiative2474 on
Like I said in the previous post it’s not even a denial it’s true. You can use data and say “oh it increased crime rates” and comparing it to smoking and all that nonsense all you want but it’s true. It is not inherently addictive. Just like food, television, exercise, video games and other activities and such it’s not inherently and clinically addictive. And don’t even thinking about replying and other floodgate opening because I know that’s exactly what I and many others are gonna hear from the pro panicking over technical stuff crowd who will dig their heels and say negative and paranoia of these accessories no matter what.
Daleabbo on
So the next question for him should be did you hire psychologists? Can you release them from NDA’s to answer questions.
These things are not just addictive by chance, they hire psychologists to do this.
That-Interaction-45 on
Why am I on fucking reddit so much then Adam?
JonnyBravoII on
This isn’t news. This is the guy, whose job 100% depends on that addiction, testilying. He knows it. Zuck definitely knows it. But he makes millions and he’s willing to lie and destroy people’s lives to keep that cash flowing. Simple as that.
CelebrationFit8548 on
Big tobacco: „something, something, ‚doesn’t give you cancer'“ kinda of vibes going on.
verugan on
Just in, tobacco executives say cigarettes don’t cause cancer
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
10 Kommentare
Just like cigarette companies.
There is only 1 chief and it’s Zuck
Violent crimes have been committed by those clinically addicted to social media when forced to go cold turkey.
Oxy seller says oxy isn’t addictive – turns out it was
Tobacco sellers said tobacco wasn’t addictive, turns out it is.
Alcohol manufacturers…oddly never really denied it was addictive just that they shouldn’t be held responsible for combatting the addiction.
Like I said in the previous post it’s not even a denial it’s true. You can use data and say “oh it increased crime rates” and comparing it to smoking and all that nonsense all you want but it’s true. It is not inherently addictive. Just like food, television, exercise, video games and other activities and such it’s not inherently and clinically addictive. And don’t even thinking about replying and other floodgate opening because I know that’s exactly what I and many others are gonna hear from the pro panicking over technical stuff crowd who will dig their heels and say negative and paranoia of these accessories no matter what.
So the next question for him should be did you hire psychologists? Can you release them from NDA’s to answer questions.
These things are not just addictive by chance, they hire psychologists to do this.
Why am I on fucking reddit so much then Adam?
This isn’t news. This is the guy, whose job 100% depends on that addiction, testilying. He knows it. Zuck definitely knows it. But he makes millions and he’s willing to lie and destroy people’s lives to keep that cash flowing. Simple as that.
Big tobacco: „something, something, ‚doesn’t give you cancer'“ kinda of vibes going on.
Just in, tobacco executives say cigarettes don’t cause cancer