Bei jedem neuen Gesetz zu Online-Schäden muss es um den Schutz von Kindern gehen – und nicht um die Überwachung der Meinungsäußerung
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-online-harms-bill-c-63/
Bei jedem neuen Gesetz zu Online-Schäden muss es um den Schutz von Kindern gehen – und nicht um die Überwachung der Meinungsäußerung
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-online-harms-bill-c-63/
2 Kommentare
As a free speech advocate, I think it’s prudent to refine the bill so that it achieves its intended purposes. I’m open to the idea of keeping young children off of social media but I completely disagree with the notion that someone can be completely banned from the internet. Given the setup of modern society, banning someone wholesale from the internet stops them from accessing even basic services from both the public and private sector. I simply do not trust the government or any government to use that power appropriately
I can’t read this due to the paywall.
But personally, I think that any opinion piece by Peter Menzies, the Stephen Harper appointee to the CRTC during whose tenure the CRTC approved the billions of dollars in corporate consolidations that gave us the vertically integrated Robellus oligopoly that we have today, and has since spent the past decade plus penning op-eds attacking just about every attempt to regulate big tech oligopolies or limit corporate power in any way, using the most tired and hackneyed rhetoric of the long-bankrupt techno-utopianism, should not just stay behind a paywall, it should be behind a brick wall.
Either that or be accompanied by a laugh track provided by the corporate lobbyists at Spotify.