Share.

    13 Kommentare

    1. Submission statement: This shows wilfully and intentional violation of the Epstein File Transparency Act and both should be charged in inherent obstruction. They’ll likely be given immunity as they were just “following orders”.

    2. If Anonymous ever actually existed, this would be a good time to come out of the woodworks.

    3. Oldmanwaffle on

      Side note: that may be the only photo of Kash that I’ve seen where he looks semi normal and tolerable as a human being

    4. Drain the swamp = Yes we can, they scam us every fucking time. Your taxes > Your Vote. Let that sink in for a minute or two

    5. Vaqueroparate on

      But why would they reveal THIS? They’re just fucking with our minds at this point…

    6. Hollywood-is-DOA on

      It’s why I don’t do politics, as they will concentrate over the swamp and call it DC. Now DC was a swamp, for all those that don’t know.

    7. Impressionist_Canary on

      Wait, now that someone else posted a link to the actual doc so it can be read (how is this still not SOP in here, it’s literally the first step anyone should be doing when reading an Epstein doc):

      The email is asking about overall guidance about how to redact files, which seems pretty standard (and why they’re seemingly frustrated about not having received it). They’re just illustrating there’s a wide variety of categories of persons for which they need to know the rules on.

      Now, what this email *does* show is a lack of leadership in how to handle the case and disclosure (not that we needed more proof).

    8. EVERY SINGLE ONE IS INVOLVED. Doesn’t matter which side of the political isle. They’re all scamming and laundering your money and the rest are buying and selling kids.

    Leave A Reply