Share.

    8 Kommentare

    1. BerzerkoFord on

      Yeah, good luck with that.

      We should start charging or docking paychecks of politicians for wasted and excessive partisan speech in the house, or answers that are really useless non-answers.

      Hit them in their fat well-padded government paychecks, and maybe they’ll start behaving like elected officials worth being paid that much.

    2. Gullible_Prior248 on

      This shit always got under my skin if I answered my employer or customer question like some MPs do I’d be fired on the spot

    3. loginisverybroken on

      I’m not an Albertan but Hogan has been an excellent communicator and his constituents are lucky to have him as their MP regardless of party. I don’t always agree with what he’s saying but he gives reasonable well thought out answers and as much as that is a low bar it is good to see an MP exceed that.

    4. While we are at it, could we also stop having MPs use committee meetings for social media sound bytes too please.

    5. ghost_n_the_shell on

      We all want answers.
      What we get is longer run ons spouting rehearsed party billship, with no actual questions being answered.

      Want less noise? Sure. Then agree to being forced to answer a question, and the answers will be mediated.

      So now, you would be required to answer yes or no questions. Want to add more? Do so. After you have said yes or no, or that’s undecided.

    6. In its current format that would be pretty pointless, no one answers questions anyway.

      It’s basically just debating

    7. True_Dog_4098 on

      As anyone that has watched question period, I don’t think longer answers are the issue. I think actual answers to questions are what is needed.

    Leave A Reply