Kanadas Konservative geben ihrem Trump-ähnlichen Führer eine zweite Chance

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/31/world/americas/canada-pierre-poilievre-conservatives.html

4 Kommentare

  1. OhHiMarkZ69 on

    But he can’t do anything about Danielle Smith directly enabling Alberta separatists.. uhhhhh the Liberals.

    Then there’s the hyphens dog whistle.

    Seriously what is the red line for conservative supporters?

  2. WarCarrotAF on

    They’ve given him another chance because they’ve done a piss poor job of setting up anyone else up for leadership; Pierre is their only option right now.

    He’s a career politician with virtually nothing to show for it. If he keeps consulting with Byrne and Outhouse, we can expect more attack-based politics where the goal is division, slogans like Axe The Tax, and cramming the „us vs them“ narrative down all our throats.

    I don’t want to hate or be at odds with my fellow Canadians based on their political beliefs (I draw that line with separatists or Maple MAGA).

    With everything going on in the U.S. right now, Canada can’t afford to have a leader like Polievre in power.

  3. Sufficient-Tutor-922 on

    It seems crazy , but its almost crazier to think what would of happened if the CPC hadn’t parachuted him back in .

  4. spaceporter on

    There are similarities, but most of them are superficial. PP isn’t a good party leader, and he’s way more trumpy than Scheer, O’Toole, Harper or Ford, but there’s still a huge gap. He’s not Mr. wonderful. 

    That PP chooses to lean into those similarities shows that he’s just a bad politician because not even the right in Canada likes Trump right now. 

Leave A Reply