Close Menu
    Politics

    Epstein-Anträge „befreien mich“, behauptet Trump

    Share.
    View 30 Comments

    30 Kommentare

    1. casualfrog68 on

      „The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.“

      George Orwell, 1984.

    3. CouchCorrespondent on

      I’m thinking a lot of pedophiles say similar things while sitting in prison.

    6. SoftwarePrudent2609 on

      At age 16, while modeling, caller attended 8 parties at Epstein’s New York residence. On one occasion, caller reported she was sexually assaulted by Epstein. On another occasion, two twin brothers, Allen and Oren, lured caller and her friend upstairs but they escaped back downstairs. Caller stated Oren raped her best friend and a third brother, Tal, raped a 14 year old girl named
      Caller
      named other individuals involved in „big orgy parties“ with her, other young girls, and older Victoria’s Secret models, including Bill Clinton and Donald Trump.

    8. SoftwarePrudent2609 on

      Complainant reported participating in orgies and that some girls went missing, rumored to have been murdered and buried at the facility.

    9. Groundbreaking-Ask-5 on

      When all the unredacted files are released. Also the current release only shows that trump was lying about the closeness of his relationship with pedophile, rapist, and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

    14. ScoutsterReturns on

      The Emperor has new clothes am I right? The silence from the GOP is deafening!

    15. Puzzled-Dress-4904 on

      Certainly that will be the line promoted by the plutocrats and oligarchy who controlled the media, including the social media.    And so after a little while that will be the line accepted by most of the American people.      

      The question is what can we do about that before the election?

    16. HonoredPeople on

      They show multiple testimonials of you having sex with children. And that’s what you’ve allowed to be shown.

    17. ranchoparksteve on

      Trump is not absolved in any portion we’re able to read. Is Trump absolved in the redacted portions? Clearly not. It’s ridiculous.

    18. Tokie-Dokie on

      So many people who scrubbed these files that are complicit in covering up for a brutal child rapist. I hope it haunts them forever.

    19. Brilliant-Bit4449 on

      Elon already removed any evidence…that’s what DOGE was actually for.

    20. Umami-Ice-Cream on

      Is that why he hid them? And lied about them? And threatened? And redacted them to hell?

    22. iamliterallyonfire on

      Not even remotely do they absolve him. The only thing these files and his comment do is lend credibility to the fact that the DOJ is actively trying to protect him by throwing other people’s names into the mix. Throw that miserable piece of shit in prison for the rest of his pathetic life.

    23. Brilliant-Bit4449 on

      From Ro Khanna:

      **“What are we looking for? The** [**FBI**](https://www.commondreams.org/tag/fbi) **statements,” Khanna (D-Calif.) told MS NOW. “We need to see whether the 302 forms are being released. That’s where the survivors mention who the other rich and powerful men are who abused or raped them… and second, are the prosecution memos being released? This is the document that shows why these rich and powerful men weren’t prosecuted.**

    24. oiseaua20 on

      I mean, we should totally take Trump’s word for it—he’s only mentioned in there about 1,000 to 3,000 times. That’s practically the same as zero if you use the ‚Teflon Don‘ math where facts are just suggestions made by the ‚radical left.‘

    26. eugene20 on

      This is also what he said about the Mueller report, now what did that say…

      >The investigation produced 37 indictments; seven guilty pleas or convictions; and compelling evidence that the president obstructed justice on multiple occasions. Mueller also uncovered and referred 14 criminal matters to other components of the Department of Justice.

      >Trump associates repeatedly lied to investigators about their contacts with Russians, and President Trump refused to answer questions about his efforts to impede federal proceedings and influence the testimony of witnesses.
      A statement signed by over 1,000 former federal prosecutors concluded that if any other American engaged in the same efforts to impede federal proceedings the way Trump did, they would [likely be indicted](https://medium.com/@dojalumni/statement-by-former-federal-prosecutors-8ab7691c2aa1) for multiple charges of obstruction of justice.

      [https://www.acslaw.org/projects/the-presidential-investigation-education-project/other-resources/key-findings-of-the-mueller-report/](https://www.acslaw.org/projects/the-presidential-investigation-education-project/other-resources/key-findings-of-the-mueller-report/)

    29. UncleRicoFromTT on

      Ummm yeahh about that “fingering on stage to check tightness” thing. We’re going to need some clarification.

    Leave A Reply