Share.

    5 Kommentare

    1. Appropriate_Mess_350 on

      Carney listing facts doesn’t seem terribly divisive. No silly slogans. Nothing disparaging said about the Conservative Party, or Poilievre himself. Are you sure this is an “attack” ad?

    2. I really rather they not. I hate seeing the anti-PP ads on their social media.

      PP speaks for himself and his party. Let him keeping digging his own political grave.

      Carney and the LPC would simply stand on their merits. So far they seem to be doing well with Canadians supportive of the canola deal, his speech at Davos, the trade deals he’s signing, and how he’s been able to cooperate and collaborate with the premiers.

      If one of PP’s faults are his toxicity and cynicism, then attack ads when Canadians already know who he is only joining his rhetoric.

    3. Toronto-1975 on

      what a strange little conservative fluff piece. i havent read anything in Now for years but is this sort of blatant conservative glazing normal for them?

      best part for me was when they said the attack ads prompted a „mixed“ reaction online but then only shared examples of people who had a negative reaction. okay emily hwang whatever you say no bias there whatsoever…lol

    4. PolloConTeriyaki on

      Lol the leadership review actually saves the Liberals money. They can just recycle shit from the last 5 years of PP.

      Carney is fiscally strong as well.

    5. Not sure I’d say contrasting the two leaders style like that is an „attack“ ad. Poilievre looks weak even in CPC ads.

    Leave A Reply