Schlagwörter
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Karte
Karten
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Map
Maps
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Polen
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
Ukraine War Video Report
UkraineWarVideoReport
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News

20 Kommentare
„I don’t remember exactly when I first thought something was seriously wrong with the transatlantic relationship. Over the years, particularly in my time at the Hudson Institute think tank in Washington, I had many opportunities to meet and talk to the young conservatives coming up through the ranks of the Republican Party, the cohort which has now taken over the Trump administration. There certainly was something wrong then, but it took me a while to fully grasp it.
At first, I would listen to their seemingly harmless banter. There were jokes about the bureaucracy in Brussels or the long holiday breaks in Europe, the hagiography of Silicon Valley founders, and talk of the shameful absence of European counterparts. Cracks about the European propensity for too much talk and no action. The “Europoor” internet meme. Sometimes the jokes were even amusing, but at some point they turned into what seemed like a fixation. It was no longer funny. It was obvious that a powerful form of Europhobia was developing among a new generation of American elites, the kind of Europhobia today represented by the National Security Strategy issued by the Trump administration in December, in which Europe is portrayed as a civilisational enemy. It is the same Europhobia that leads secretary of the treasury Scott Bessent to go on television, as he did on 18 January, and claim that Europe projects weakness, while the US projects strength.
In retrospect, it seems to me that this political and intellectual current had an important impact on Brexit. Flowing almost unimpeded from American conservative circles to their equivalents in Britain, it helped shape the perception that the European Union was a historical loser, outdated and finished. The description of the EU as facing “civilisational erasure” through open immigration, now present in Trump’s official National Security Strategy, illuminates much about the Brexit-era fears over immigration a decade ago.
If Brexit was the first blow against the EU from a new Europhobic movement in America, we now face a second and far more serious attack. As the ideological worldviews prevalent in Europe and America continue to diverge, there is an obvious risk that the military and technological dependencies Europeans have allowed to develop may be used against them. For many decades, the West functioned as both a political and emotional community. In such a community, mutual dependence is not exploited, and partners refrain from anything that could jeopardise a shared destiny. But without the West as a political community, that logic disappears. I am told that German policymakers now lie awake at night worrying about what would happen if Trump decided to turn off the spigot of liquefied natural gas crossing the Atlantic. Germany is now more dependent on the US for energy than it ever was on Russia.
Warnings about the end of the world forged in 1945 are common sense, not alarmism. Donald Trump has made it clear that he wants sovereignty over Greenland, not mere access, and the announcement of 10 per cent tariffs against a number of European countries looks like an initial salvo in a campaign of economic coercion. These measures should be compared to a form of blockade during wartime, rather than the wave of tariffs announced in 2025, whose goal was purely economic.
If economic coercion fails, American troops in Greenland could attempt to prevent Danish vessels or aircraft from landing on the island. Should European countries accept the inevitability of such a move – whether a forced purchase or a military operation – any notion of European sovereignty would vanish. No one would again take either the EU or its member states seriously. After years of praising Ukraine for its courage and sacrifice in defending its sovereignty and territory, how shameful it would be if Europe were incapable of doing the same.
In the social media post announcing the new tariffs, Trump already seemed to regard European countries as no longer sovereign. The tariffs were presented as a response to a small deployment of troops from Germany, Sweden, France, Norway, the Netherlands, Finland and Britain. Trump accused them of playing a dangerous game, even though he had previously criticised them for not sending enough troops to Greenland. But why should sovereign countries be unable to participate in exercises with Denmark, the host nation, or why should Denmark be prevented from moving troops within its own territory? Bessent has argued that Europeans must accept diminished sovereignty because they are entirely dependent on Washington for their defence. This could mark the beginning of a century of humiliation. Writing in 1994, Henry Kissinger suggested it was easy to imagine a future in which Europe would lose its independence – not to Russia or China, but to the United States.
Break sounds dramatic, But more Strategic Independence while cooperating feels like the real conversation, Europe’s been circling for years.
What are we waiting for?
🇺🇦🇨🇦🇪🇺🇬🇧🇩🇪🇩🇰🇦🇺🇨🇭🇧🇻🇳🇿🇮🇸🇨🇿🇳🇱🇪🇪🇫🇮🇸🇪🇱🇻🇱🇹🇵🇱🇫🇷🇯🇵🇦🇹🇿🇦🇷🇴🇮🇪🇮🇹🇪🇸🇵🇹🇱🇺🇬🇷🇭🇷🇸🇮🇧🇪🇫🇴🇧🇬🇹🇼
🇲🇪🇲🇰🇦🇱🇽🇰🇲🇹🇸🇲🇦🇩🇲🇩🇨🇾🇹🇷
An actual break will only be to Russia’s benefit. A long-term redefined, but still cordial and co-operative relationship between a stabler America and a stronger, more assertive Europe is best.
The Netherlands is launching their own build serie of spy satellites.
https://hollandhightech.nl/en/news-calendar/news/archive/2024/pami-1-is-the-first-in-a-series-of-satellites-to-strengthen-dutch-space-capabilities
All weather satellites, first one launched last summer.
https://www.nlspacecampus.eu/news/netherlands-enters-military-space-era-with-first-sar-satellite-and-new-royal-netherlands-air-and-space-force/
They are also researching a long range cruise missle.
https://www.armyrecognition.com/news/army-news/2025/netherlands-wants-to-develop-an-alternative-to-the-u-s-tomahawk-cruise-missile
And then depending on India. Mass immigration is real
You always play into the Kremlin’s plans. Have some faith, patience and pit Trump in his place. Get some balls for once and stay united.
Like, right now? Hard break? You’ll only play to the Russian hands
How many of the same bullshit „must do this” and „has to” and „considers doing” articles are we going to get about the same fucking shit?
Shut the fuck up and put up the money to actually make the necessary changes.
It’s doubtful that the predicted scenario will unfold quickly. While the threat of a Greenland occupation has been a real eye-opener, there are major hurdles. First, inertia is a powerful force. Second, right now, without the US, Europe cannot handle the Ukrainian crisis on its own, nor can it pull Ukraine out of economic catastrophe.
Therefore, this process will be drawn out over decades.
Another major problem is that, apart from the individual small nation-states which the article’s author sees as an issue, there are also large national autonomies, such as Catalonia. So, time and the forging of a new compromise are needed.
We also have to factor in that China and Russia will also work to keep Europe a fragmented political entity.
Thus, although the author correctly identifies the trend, in my view, this process will take several decades at the very least.
A lot of Americans have no clue about Europe anymore. Our media if they cover anything it’s either a diplomatic story or a tragic story. Mostly the latter.
Recently there have been stories about tariffs, which of course are not great for us, although it’s our fault essentially.
Yea and LARP India?
Write more articles about it.
It has already happened. It hasn’t materialized fully yet due to existing and established infrastructure, contracts etc.
The US will be phased out as soon as a sector can stand on its own.
Military, is the are where there is most progress.
Energy has to push already existing European energy initiatives into warp speed.
Digital services, the end user consumers are already switching, but enterprise needs a solid boost with new EU tech reforms.
Payment rails. This one really hurts. The EU has local initiatives but nothing that is globally accepted like Visa/Mastercard. Some very thorough decisions with a 5 year transition plan have to be made right now. We can’t all use local EU apps, we need real European payment, settlement and clearing structure for global Creditcards and transfers.
America „Hey, we gotta have a talk, we are breaking up with you, it’s not us it’s you“
Europe „Hey World, we are breaking up with America, we can do better anyway… so India, how you doin?“
Nothing coming from politicians mouth, is good for plebs!
Europe is at risk of going the same way as America: France and Germany have extreme right parties polling at or near the top, the UK has Reform currently on fire, Italy has Meloni and Hungary has Orban, with other countries also dealing with a powerful hard right, one that is as dictatorial as it is criminal.
It is necessary moderates/centrists in all nations to start speaking with each other. Otherwise we may see Ukraine x20 fold across the Western world.
Europe must break from mass immigration*
It’s what Putin wants. Stupid overreaction
Should probably start with cancelling those palantir deals.