Can’t even afford a bottle of KY Jelly anymore. Simple as.
Vegemite-Sandwich901 on
No one has any money and everything feels extremely precarious?
Leather-Paramedic-10 on
>“This strong decline in fertility is due not only to a decreased birth rate, but also to an increase in the number of women who do not have children either by choice, by circumstance or because they are delaying motherhood,” the agency said.
>
>“In fact, the average age of mothers at the birth of their first child has been increasing in Canada for decades.”
>
>In 2024, that number reached an all-time high of 31.8 years. Although women are, on average, having their first child later in life compared to previous generations, StatCan’s data suggest that most women of childbearing age in Canada want to have children eventually.
…
>“These results show that fertility does not depend solely on individual preferences, it also reflects complex socioeconomic and cultural factors, particularly for women under the age of 40 years,” the agency said.
>
>“They also show the importance of policies that encourage balancing career and parenthood.”
Onterrible_Trauma on
Every single developed nation has a falling fertility rate. Shit is too expensive to have children in Western democracies.
But hey, I guess I’d rather have this than be living in the Middle East, South Asia, or Sub-Saharan Africa…
coffeeinthecity on
Why would I want to have a child in Canada when we have record youth unemployment and instead of prioritizing Canadian workers, our government makes it easier for companies to bring in cheap foreign labour? What kind of future would that child have? Parents want their children to have a better quality of life than what they had but the Canada I grew up in no longer exists.
USSMarauder on
Reminder that the Canadian fertility rate has been below replacement levels for over 50 years
We should be incentivizing population growth from within rather than trying to import our way out of this demographic cliff – but our masters see things differently
The_Frostweaver on
Potential mothers want a stable relationship and financial security before they have a child.
BCRE8TVE on
-Young people can’t affort housing
-Young people can barely afford rent
-Young people can barely afford food
-Young people can’t afford to go out
-Young people can’t afford education
-Young people can’t get jobs
-The jobs young people can get don’t pay well
-Young men can’t afford to pay for dates, which dries up the dating market
-Young people can’t afford to get married
*insert „who killed hannibal“ meme, guy shooting the other dude in the chair, and wondering who could have done this*
Idiocracy is turning out more and more to be a prediction instead of a parody, and somehow people are still surprised.
pyfinx on
Yeah well fucking RTO won’t help along with million other unaffordability issues.
chewwydraper on
There are factors such as access to birth control which plays a big role in this.
But it also needs to be noted that millennials are really the first generation in a long time where both parents HAVE to work.
I was born in 1993, my dad worked at a factory and my mom stayed at home. We had a decent middle-class life. Simply put, that’s nearly impossible to do now.
My fiancé and I want a family. We’d have 5 kids if it were viable. But we both work, and things are still tight. None of us want to come home after a long day and still need to do chores, run errands and now add raising a child in the mix.
If it were viable for her to be a SAHM, that’s what she’d want to do, she’s explicitly said so. But it’s simply no longer an option, so kids have been delayed. We’ll be lucky if we have one.
Quality of life would be objectively better if one parent could comfortably support a family while the other stayed (doesn’t matter which gender). Not only does it make having kids more viable, but typically a stay-at-home-parent takes care of the household stuff as well – chores, errands, cooking, etc. it’s a full-time job too.
HotBreakfast2205 on
Families are becoming nuclear, with no extended family to help out to look after children, without hiring a nanny, or putting your kids in day care, while two people can barely afford a roof over their heads.
Every little thing required for the child, and the family, is an additional expense.
Wages haven’t caught up to expenses, for many more reasons.
The pre-industrialization era lived through the war, the famines, the plague, and cholera.
Post-industrialization – we have capitalism everywhere, low mortality, and an increasing aged population.
Aggravating_Exit2445 on
People need to be able to afford to have children. Young families often cannot afford the expense of having a child, let alone the childcare costs or the extra living space required. We would have loved to have had more children, but it was a struggle financially to even have one, and once we were financially stable enough to be able to afford to have more, the clock had run out on that possibility.
If we as a society want to have a birth rate above replacement, we have to support, encourage, and incentivize young families to have children.
publicworker69 on
Basically all developed countries have a fertility rate under replacement level. Women don’t stay home anymore, they work, better access to contraceptives. And then add in the cost of living. Not hard to figure out.
Paul24312 on
Let me think.
Young Canadians are being priced out of the housing market, barely afford groceries for themselves, and being screwed in every way possible?
But hey, atleast the TFW and PR people get what they want.
toilet_for_shrek on
**It’s expensive**
Next question?
Hippiegypsy1989 on
Honestly, I think birth rates have been plummeting since women entered the workforce. I have trouble enough juggling a full time job and everyday life without adding kids into the mix. Why would I put more on myself when I’m already exhausted?
Jenshark86 on
By the time young women and men are finally financially stable to have children, they are in their 40s. So of course they are having infertility issues.
TheDeathSystem on
Canada „Our women aren’t having babies, oh no!“
Also Canada “ We expect people to live in small units, pay rent and work to death so there’s no time or space for family.“
butch_clean on
Like are we really confused?
CrazyGal2121 on
As a mom of two
having kids is now a luxury likely.
BaroqueGorgon on
I’m a 40-year-old woman that never had kids for genetic, family and monetary reasons.
Our society needs to pick a lane – they clearly expect women to somehow pop out and raise a bunch of kids while we also work full-time jobs to stay afloat, and pay out of the nose to have your kids raised by a bunch of near-strangers with dubious credentials. Which is it – are mothers valued or they thrown to the wolves and Children’s Aid if they leave their 10-year-old at home for an hour alone?
What about that sounds appealing?
luckysharms93 on
Can’t possibly be my 3700$/month mortgage for a fucking townhouse
No-Song6363 on
Buying a half full box of crackers costs me 5.99$, that’s why
slumlordscanstarve on
Lower population isn’t bad. The earth can only support so many.
Also, many people probably shouldn’t have kids. There are so many parents who do not have the empathy or intelligence to care for a rock never mind a sentient being. It’s good more people think about the consequences of children to this planet and themselves.
broccoli_toots on
Nothing about parenthood looks appealing to me. Also like, I don’t really like kids, so why would I want one?
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
26 Kommentare
Can’t even afford a bottle of KY Jelly anymore. Simple as.
No one has any money and everything feels extremely precarious?
>“This strong decline in fertility is due not only to a decreased birth rate, but also to an increase in the number of women who do not have children either by choice, by circumstance or because they are delaying motherhood,” the agency said.
>
>“In fact, the average age of mothers at the birth of their first child has been increasing in Canada for decades.”
>
>In 2024, that number reached an all-time high of 31.8 years. Although women are, on average, having their first child later in life compared to previous generations, StatCan’s data suggest that most women of childbearing age in Canada want to have children eventually.
…
>“These results show that fertility does not depend solely on individual preferences, it also reflects complex socioeconomic and cultural factors, particularly for women under the age of 40 years,” the agency said.
>
>“They also show the importance of policies that encourage balancing career and parenthood.”
Every single developed nation has a falling fertility rate. Shit is too expensive to have children in Western democracies.
But hey, I guess I’d rather have this than be living in the Middle East, South Asia, or Sub-Saharan Africa…
Why would I want to have a child in Canada when we have record youth unemployment and instead of prioritizing Canadian workers, our government makes it easier for companies to bring in cheap foreign labour? What kind of future would that child have? Parents want their children to have a better quality of life than what they had but the Canada I grew up in no longer exists.
Reminder that the Canadian fertility rate has been below replacement levels for over 50 years
[https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/91f0015m/91f0015m2024001-eng.htm](https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/91f0015m/91f0015m2024001-eng.htm)
We should be incentivizing population growth from within rather than trying to import our way out of this demographic cliff – but our masters see things differently
Potential mothers want a stable relationship and financial security before they have a child.
-Young people can’t affort housing
-Young people can barely afford rent
-Young people can barely afford food
-Young people can’t afford to go out
-Young people can’t afford education
-Young people can’t get jobs
-The jobs young people can get don’t pay well
-Young men can’t afford to pay for dates, which dries up the dating market
-Young people can’t afford to get married
*insert „who killed hannibal“ meme, guy shooting the other dude in the chair, and wondering who could have done this*
Idiocracy is turning out more and more to be a prediction instead of a parody, and somehow people are still surprised.
Yeah well fucking RTO won’t help along with million other unaffordability issues.
There are factors such as access to birth control which plays a big role in this.
But it also needs to be noted that millennials are really the first generation in a long time where both parents HAVE to work.
I was born in 1993, my dad worked at a factory and my mom stayed at home. We had a decent middle-class life. Simply put, that’s nearly impossible to do now.
My fiancé and I want a family. We’d have 5 kids if it were viable. But we both work, and things are still tight. None of us want to come home after a long day and still need to do chores, run errands and now add raising a child in the mix.
If it were viable for her to be a SAHM, that’s what she’d want to do, she’s explicitly said so. But it’s simply no longer an option, so kids have been delayed. We’ll be lucky if we have one.
Quality of life would be objectively better if one parent could comfortably support a family while the other stayed (doesn’t matter which gender). Not only does it make having kids more viable, but typically a stay-at-home-parent takes care of the household stuff as well – chores, errands, cooking, etc. it’s a full-time job too.
Families are becoming nuclear, with no extended family to help out to look after children, without hiring a nanny, or putting your kids in day care, while two people can barely afford a roof over their heads.
Every little thing required for the child, and the family, is an additional expense.
Wages haven’t caught up to expenses, for many more reasons.
The pre-industrialization era lived through the war, the famines, the plague, and cholera.
Post-industrialization – we have capitalism everywhere, low mortality, and an increasing aged population.
People need to be able to afford to have children. Young families often cannot afford the expense of having a child, let alone the childcare costs or the extra living space required. We would have loved to have had more children, but it was a struggle financially to even have one, and once we were financially stable enough to be able to afford to have more, the clock had run out on that possibility.
If we as a society want to have a birth rate above replacement, we have to support, encourage, and incentivize young families to have children.
Basically all developed countries have a fertility rate under replacement level. Women don’t stay home anymore, they work, better access to contraceptives. And then add in the cost of living. Not hard to figure out.
Let me think.
Young Canadians are being priced out of the housing market, barely afford groceries for themselves, and being screwed in every way possible?
But hey, atleast the TFW and PR people get what they want.
**It’s expensive**
Next question?
Honestly, I think birth rates have been plummeting since women entered the workforce. I have trouble enough juggling a full time job and everyday life without adding kids into the mix. Why would I put more on myself when I’m already exhausted?
By the time young women and men are finally financially stable to have children, they are in their 40s. So of course they are having infertility issues.
Canada „Our women aren’t having babies, oh no!“
Also Canada “ We expect people to live in small units, pay rent and work to death so there’s no time or space for family.“
Like are we really confused?
As a mom of two
having kids is now a luxury likely.
I’m a 40-year-old woman that never had kids for genetic, family and monetary reasons.
Our society needs to pick a lane – they clearly expect women to somehow pop out and raise a bunch of kids while we also work full-time jobs to stay afloat, and pay out of the nose to have your kids raised by a bunch of near-strangers with dubious credentials. Which is it – are mothers valued or they thrown to the wolves and Children’s Aid if they leave their 10-year-old at home for an hour alone?
What about that sounds appealing?
Can’t possibly be my 3700$/month mortgage for a fucking townhouse
Buying a half full box of crackers costs me 5.99$, that’s why
Lower population isn’t bad. The earth can only support so many.
Also, many people probably shouldn’t have kids. There are so many parents who do not have the empathy or intelligence to care for a rock never mind a sentient being. It’s good more people think about the consequences of children to this planet and themselves.
Nothing about parenthood looks appealing to me. Also like, I don’t really like kids, so why would I want one?