Hard to imagine Poilievre is in real trouble without an alternative leader emerging. A lot of tories have to be thinking its too risky to create a power vacuum in a party that may not hold together if it has to hash out its contradictions in a leadership contest.
OkFix4074 on
PP is yesterdays news looking to stay relevant today , Sooner CPC drop this dead weight – it will be good for Canadian democracy and a viable opposition leader
DaOffensiveChicken on
pierre doesnt seem to realize that trump winning and starting hte 51st state rhetoric was basically canadas version of 9/11
the boomer vote he needs to win doesnt care about cost of living or the scandals of the previous government or any specific policy at all they just want someone to make them feel good about trump
i dont think he can do that canada wants a mark carney or stephen harper type leader right now whos well spoken and calm and professional not a flame thrower like pp
Ok_Smile9222 on
He’ll almost certainly survive this leadership review, and it’ll be a mistake. Yesterday while Carney is giving the biggest speech of his career, Pierre is tweeting about the carbon tax. The fucking carbon tax. Again.
Tiny-Albatross518 on
As a progressive voter I still want a good competitive Conservative party.
There must be an alternative, there must be brisk debate. A sick party limping along jn opposition is in the end bad for everyone.
banyanoak on
My guess is that smart potential leadership candidates understand that, in the eyes of Canadians, Carney is uniquely qualified for this particular moment. It would be unwise as a potential leader to shoot your shot right now. Better to wait until the next review, when Carney’s shine may be starting to come off, and when the NDP may have re-established themselves — the Liberals have a huge advantage so long as they have the left.
Probably rank and file Conservatives feel the same way and would also rather save a viable leader for a time when a win is actually possible.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
6 Kommentare
Hard to imagine Poilievre is in real trouble without an alternative leader emerging. A lot of tories have to be thinking its too risky to create a power vacuum in a party that may not hold together if it has to hash out its contradictions in a leadership contest.
PP is yesterdays news looking to stay relevant today , Sooner CPC drop this dead weight – it will be good for Canadian democracy and a viable opposition leader
pierre doesnt seem to realize that trump winning and starting hte 51st state rhetoric was basically canadas version of 9/11
the boomer vote he needs to win doesnt care about cost of living or the scandals of the previous government or any specific policy at all they just want someone to make them feel good about trump
i dont think he can do that canada wants a mark carney or stephen harper type leader right now whos well spoken and calm and professional not a flame thrower like pp
He’ll almost certainly survive this leadership review, and it’ll be a mistake. Yesterday while Carney is giving the biggest speech of his career, Pierre is tweeting about the carbon tax. The fucking carbon tax. Again.
As a progressive voter I still want a good competitive Conservative party.
There must be an alternative, there must be brisk debate. A sick party limping along jn opposition is in the end bad for everyone.
My guess is that smart potential leadership candidates understand that, in the eyes of Canadians, Carney is uniquely qualified for this particular moment. It would be unwise as a potential leader to shoot your shot right now. Better to wait until the next review, when Carney’s shine may be starting to come off, and when the NDP may have re-established themselves — the Liberals have a huge advantage so long as they have the left.
Probably rank and file Conservatives feel the same way and would also rather save a viable leader for a time when a win is actually possible.