Dies ist eine gute Erinnerung daran, dass „Rekordaktivität“ nicht immer bessere Fundamentaldaten bedeutet. Manchmal bedeutet es einfach, dass der billigste Schauspieler zuerst auftauchte.
Wie sollten Menschen eigentlich die „echte“ Nutzung messen, wenn die Gebühren nicht mehr die Einschränkung darstellen?
https://www.sandmark.com/news/analysis/ethereum-record-metrics-mask-surge-onchain-spam?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=redbot&utm_campaign=redbot-ww-en-brand
2 Kommentare
tldr; Ethereum’s Fusaka upgrade in December 2025 aimed to improve Layer 2 data handling and reduce gas fees, leading to record transaction counts and active addresses in January 2026. However, the surge was driven by spam attacks, particularly stablecoin ‚dust‘ attacks, rather than genuine adoption. Automated scripts exploited the lower fees, with 67% of new wallets receiving transactions under $1. While Fusaka expanded Layer 2 capacity, its benefits were underutilized, highlighting a gap between scaling and security measures.
*This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
ETH collecting all the possible records lately, but the price one :/