Close Menu
    Karten

    Bei Grönland bin ich mir nicht sicher.

    Share.
    View 39 Comments

    39 Kommentare

    4. Substantial_Bad2421 on

      I’m dumb at history so bear with me. But in this case will whole USSR lay down for Germany? I mean, there was accident with submarine near with „Novya Zemlya“ from Germany’s side so therefore it’s not „Safest places“ at all and I can say about other areas. Yes, it is cold but many recources and other stuff

    8. nidarus on

      The Greenland affair is probably based on the assumption that the arctic circle will be a significant theater of WW3. Nearly the inverse of this map.

    9. zapembarcodes on

      I’d say anywhere in the Northern Hemisphere is probably a bad place.

    10. DryDiamond476 on

      how is living in the places you can’t plant food safer than living in highly productive regions that will probably not even see any fighting?

    12. Iuxta_aequor on

      Why would the Manitoba portion of the Hudson Bay be unsafe unlike the rest?

    13. Markomann69 on

      This is just stupid. Revealed by the microplastics in your brain. What does even WW3 mean in this scenario? What countries are involved? OP just selected most north and south places and bhutan 💀

    14. Puzzleheaded-Lab-635 on

      All of natos sub /nuclear detection stuff is off the coast of Norway. I call bs.

    15. MisterFist1999 on

      NO WORLD WAR WITHOUT AUSTRIA!

      We should conquer Greenland and blame it on Germany.

    16. Slacker_75 on

      Is this map just to show the fact New Brunswick Canada will be wiped off the map come WW3?

    17. SuperPotatoGuy373 on

      Bhutan gets pretty much everything from India so they aren’t gonna last long with nuked neighbors.

    18. zanzara1968 on

      All central Europe get nuked but the swiss arent? Does the zar Vladi keep there his poket money?

    22. Buhos_En_Pantelones on

      I mean… America would be pretty well defended. We’re obviously a target, but nobody’s rolling up to this country looking for a fight. 

    23. ChimpoSensei on

      Alaska is not safe, four major military bases, missile defense shield, oil pipeline.

    25. Simple-Razzmatazz704 on

      Canada, Australia and New Zealand are all Five Eyes nations, how is that „neutral international policies“? They are literally 3/5ths of the primary multi-national counter-intelligence network opposed to Russia and China, amongst others. Australia is also part of AUKUS, basically the cowboy military alliance. Canada is part of NATO, which has an active war on its borders, and has a belligerent af neighbour, who will unquestionably be part of any broader WWIII. China was conducting military exercises in the Tasman Sea last year, considering Australia or NZ too „isolated“ to be affected by any conflict is naive and a geographic oversimplification.

      Greenland and Iceland are both being targeted by the US at the moment, to varying degrees, and the Canadian Arctic may not be far behind. Norway and northern Finland border Russia. I don’t know how serious conflict over the Falkland Islands would be nowadays, but it’s a weird place to highlight here given it’s an unresolved issue. I don’t know, this map pisses me off.

    26. PraetorianX on

      So Norway and northern Finland, both NATO countries directly bordering Russia, would be safe? But the Amazon jungle and the Sahara desert would be super dangerous?

    27. dorgoth12 on

      Yeah… and Russia is absolutely coming for Svalbard if the US takes Greenland

    28. SubnauticaFan3 on

      i could probably see new zealand being safe but idk about everything else

    30. Usagi-Zakura on

      „Low strategic Priority“

      Svalbard and Greenland.

      Uhm… sure tell that to Putin and Trump.

    31. rustedmeatpuppet on

      Greenland… im not sure because that’s where this is all going to start

    35. aronenark on

      Ah yes, the Canadian Territories and northeast Siberia— places almost entirely reliant on calories imported from warmer growing regions— are perfect places to be when farming and global supply chains become impossible.

    36. Hairysteed on

      Wait! Diego Garcia?!? Dude! That’s gonna be one of the No.1 nuclear targets! So is Guam! 🤣🤣🤣

    37. The-Copilot on

      I call bullshit, this map has Guam, Diego Garcia and Vladivostok (Russia’s pacific fleet base) marked as safe.

      All three would be major targets in a WW3 involving the US and Russia. Not to mention the GIUK gap and the current belief that the artic will likely be a major theater.

    38. BrillsonHawk on

      Yes Norway, a founding member of NATO, famous for its neutrality 🤦‍♂️

    39. TheBusStop12 on

      Finnish Lapland and Norway make no sense. Both were major hotspots during WW2, with the majority of structures burned down by the end of the war (Rovaniemi, the capital of Finnish Lapland Lost 90% of all it’s buildings)

      Both Finland and Norway have major military bases up north specifically for the defense of the Arctic. All of Finlands F35s are in Lapland for example.

      When WW3 breaks out, which if it does, would definitely involve Russia, Finnish Lapland and Norwegian Finnmark would be one of the major targets for invasion and bombing

    Leave A Reply