Schlagwörter
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Karte
Karten
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Map
Maps
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Polen
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
Ukraine War Video Report
UkraineWarVideoReport
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News

8 Kommentare
And yet they don’t give us the details of what was actually said to make our own opinions
You choose idiots for a programme that attracts idiots, what do you expect? I’d be more surprised if they posted something sensible and thought provoking.
Shocking news as TV prick turns out to be prick on social media as well.
And the anti-semitic card will be played in 5…4…3…
Not *that* Apprentice? The one that brought us Katie Hopkins and Thomas Skinner, giving them a springboard into the public eye? I’m shocked. The show that attracts highly controversial people with high opinions of themselves, and is designed to accommodate them for entertainment value?
So basically the BBC (edit: I guess I meant the production company) are supposed to choose pricks who haven’t yet shown themselves to be pricks on social media? Wouldn’t it be better just to be honest and say „We’re selecting the very best in utter twats for your amusement.“
yes they should [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-43604058](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-43604058)
Was googling for BBC demanding tighter vetting after this guy
[Apprentice contestant struck off as doctor over social media posts – BBC News](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c7v0rdey4gpo)
Cant seem to find any BBC demands about him though.
Presumably BBC not worried about the group of people he doesn’t like.